Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

Cancel
4
  • 1
    You might simplify this question - the text is less than clear. I suggest that you structure it as 1) What you require to happen 2) what actually happens, and restrict these to the externally observable behaviour - e.g. what happens if you press 8? What happens if you press 1? If you know that the LCD and Keypad functions work, You can probably omit all that code, and just show the main. Including the schematic may lead some to thinking it is a hardware question and therefore off-topic or too broad, and may vote to close - it is not really necessary.
    – Clifford
    Commented Oct 18, 2018 at 21:41
  • @Clifford I agree with you, but sometimes when you're helpless you do anything to be helped. Sorry for that headache and thank you for your help and advice .. :) Commented Oct 19, 2018 at 7:45
  • I appreciate that when you have no idea where the problem is providing everything is not unreasonable. I have no real problem; my concern was more that an otherwise reasonable question obfuscated attracts down/close votes when it could be fixed. It is not too late the fix it - the point of SO is that both questions and answers can be edited. You should however avoid fundamentally changing a question such that it renders existing answers nonsense if they were previously correct.
    – Clifford
    Commented Oct 19, 2018 at 8:35
  • @Clifford I appreciate being helpful and as I said, I'm grateful to you and your pieces of advice, have a good day :) Commented Oct 19, 2018 at 8:47