Abstract
Synopsis
Propiram is an orally administered opioid analgesic with partial morphine-like agonist and weak antagonist properties. Analgesic efficacy of propiram, usually 50 or 100mg, appears comparable to that of standard dosages of other oral opioid drugs [i.e. pentazocine, pethidine (meperidine)] in patients with acute pain of moderate to severe intensity arising from various gynaecological and surgical procedures, and may be superior to codeine in gynaecological and postoperative dental pain. Some evidence of a more rapid onset of action for propiram than for these opioid agents, and a longer duration of action for propiram than for codeine, is encouraging but remains to be substantiated in more extensive clinical use. The tolerability profile of propiram resembles those of others in its class, with drowsiness, nausea and vomiting, and dizziness experienced most frequently in controlled trials. The apparently low propensity of propiram for development of physical dependence and psychotomimetic effects requires confirmation with wider clinical experience.
Available data thus indicate that propiram is an effective, orally administered opioid analgesic suitable for providing relief of acute moderate to severe pain arising from various surgical or gynaecological procedures, and that the drug is likely to become a useful alternative in such conditions where opioid analgesia is appropriate.
Pharmacodynamic Properties
Propiram binds with relatively specific affinity to opioid μ receptors, which modulate supraspinal and spinal analgesia, but is inactive at δ receptors. Binding activity of the R-enantiomer is about 2.5% that of morphine. Thus, propiram exerts its analgesic effect by activating pathways responsible for alteration of pain perception which are mediated via opioid receptors, and involve interaction between opioid, adrenergic and serotonergic systems.
Propiram is a partial agonist, as evidenced by its activity at the μ receptor and by its ability to suppress and precipitate abstinence in morphine-dependent dogs, monkeys and humans. It is active in various animal models of morphine agonism and antagonism. As an agonist in humans, propiram is judged to be 1/7 to.1/10 as potent as morphine. As an antagonist it is approximately 1/200 as potent as nalorphine in humans and 1/1789 as potent as naloxone in dogs.
In standard pain models in animals, the milligram potency of propiram administered orally or subcutaneously was less than that of morphine, butorphanol and buprenorphine, and similar to that of codeine, dextropropoxyphene, and pethidine (meperidine). Experience in patients with pain (see Clinical Use) confirms early findings of analgesic efficacy for propiram 25 to 30mg orally as a single dose in human pain models.
In common with other partial agonist opioid analgesics possessing morphine-like agonist activity, propiram displays potential for development of physical dependence. Propiram is self-administered in humans and monkeys, substitutes for morphine in individuals dependent on low doses of the latter drug, and a mild abstinence syndrome has developed following propiram withdrawal in direct addiction studies in humans (past addicts). In contrast, in volunteers dependent on high dose morphine (240 mg/day), propiram does not serve as a sufficient substitute, and no patients in clinical trials have exhibited signs of physical dependence. This, and the preliminary finding that propiram in therapeutic dosages has shown apparently little tendency to cause psychotomimetic effects, lower its physical dependence and abuse potential relative to pure morphine agonists. However, definitive conclusions regarding these effects await broadscale experience with the drug.
Respiration in humans is depressed by propiram in a dose-related fashion, and the depressant effect of propiram 50mg intramuscularly was similar to that of morphine 10mg in healthy volunteers. Confirmation is required of limited data suggesting there may be little influence of the drug on cardiovascular parameters or on psychomotor function in healthy volunteers.
In rat intestines examined ex vivo, propiram administered subcutaneously or orally inhibited intestinal motility, but to a smaller extent than codeine or pethidine, implying a lesser constipating effect. The drug was at least as effective as parenteral codeine in suppressing cough when injected intravenously in cats and subcutaneously in dogs.
Pharmacokinetic Properties
Absorption of propiram from an oral tablet is virtually complete. Peak plasma propiram concentrations (Cmax) of about 0.3 mg/L after a single 50mg dose are attained within 0.5 to 1.5 hours. Cmax and area under the plasma concentration-time curve did not change after ingestion of propiram 25mg twice daily for 10 days in 4 healthy volunteers, indicating no drug accumulation after multiple doses.
Tissue concentrations after propiram administration in animals are highest in liver, kidney and spleen, but concentrations in the brain are similar to, or lower than, those in plasma. Propiram is detectable in human milk in quantities 2 to 3 times greater than in maternal plasma. The relatively large volume of distribution (2.3 L/kg after a single 50mg tablet) indicates extensive distribution and metabolism; indeed, propiram is largely biotransformed via the liver to its principal metabolite N-[2-(2-pyridylamino)-propyl]-N-propionyl-5-aminovaleric acid. Of the one-third of the dose retrievable as parent drug, 97% is recovered within 24 hours. Total body clearance of propiram (26.6 L/h) is greater than renal clearance (6.3 L/h), indicating extrarenal (i.e hepatic) mechanisms are important in elimination.
Approximately 80% of orally administered propiram 25 to 100mg is excreted renally and 20% via the faeces. The elimination half-life of propiram is about 5 to 7 hours.
Clinical Use in Pain States
Propiram is an effective analgesic when administered orally. Propiram 125mg orally and 100mg intramuscularly are considered equivalent in potency to morphine 10mg intramuscularly. A doseresponse relationship for analgesia is evident for propiram over the range 50 to 150mg. The analgesic efficacy of orally administered propiram was first studied in the 1970s in patients with mainly acute, but also chronic, moderate to severe pain of various aetiologies including cancer pain, who received the drug for periods usually greater than one week in large uncontrolled trials.
More recently, in patients with moderate pain arising from surgical procedures including cholecystectomy and orthopaedic surgery, propiram 50mg produced similar analgesia as pentazocine 50mg and was at least as effective as codeine 60mg and superior to dextropropoxyphene 65mg, when all agents were administered orally. More severe pain appeared to require higher dosages for all analgesics. There is some evidence for a longer duration of action for propiram than for codeine in these patients. Propiram 50mg as a single oral dose tended to be less effective than aspirin 650mg but was more beneficial and longer-lasting than codeine 60mg or placebo in ameliorating postoperative dental pain in 1 well designed trial.
Single doses of propiram 50mg administered orally have been found to be superior to placebo, similar to pentazocine 50mg and pethidine 100mg, and tended to be more effective than codeine 60mg and dextropropoxyphene 65mg in alleviating acute moderate to severe postoperative gynaecological pain. Propiram displayed a faster onset (≈0.5h) but generally similar duration of action (at least 4 hours) as these agents, although there was some suggestion of longer duration of effect with propiram than with codeine in women with severe pain. Equivalent efficacy was demonstrated for propiram 50 or 100mg and pethidine 100mg when given repeatedly for up to 5 days.
Limited published evidence has shown cancer patients with acute pain to respond to propiram 50 to 200mg, and in a few patients with chronic cancer pain propiram 50 or 100mg for up to 10 days was equivalent to levorphanol 2mg.
Tolerability
The most common adverse effects observed during administration of single doses of propiram 50 to 200mg resemble those associated with other opioid drugs of the agonist-antagonist class: most frequently experienced events in controlled trials have been drowsiness (occurring in 20 to 40% of patients), nausea/vomiting (7 to 22%), dizziness (6 to 13%), sweating (0.7 to 9%) and headache (3 to 5%).
About 45% of all propiram recipients in published and unpublished trials report at least one adverse event. This is in the range of the overall incidence cited for codeine 60mg (25 to 45%), pentazocine 50mg (42%), and aspirin 650mg (35%) in published literature comparing propiram with these agents. Apart from one instance of hallucinations, psychotomimetic effects were not experienced by propiram recipients or, indeed, by patients receiving any of the comparator opioid drugs.
In longer term uncontrolled trials, dry mouth has been reported by as many as 76% of patients and the incidence of constipation has ranged from 66% in hospitalised patients to 27% in outpatients. No changes in laboratory tests have been associated with propiram administration.
Dosage and Administration
The recommended dosage of propiram in patients with acute moderate to severe pain is 50 to 100mg orally, repeated every 4 to 6 hours as necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Pain Society. Principles of analgesic use in the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain, 3rd ed. pp. (1–41), 1992
Baumann TJ, Lehman ME. Pain management. Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., New York, 642: 679, 1989
Bell JA, Shannon HE. Partial agonists of the morphine type: facilitative effects on electrophysiologically recorded C-fiber reflexes in the cat. Neuropharmacology 27: 649–652, 1988
Bloomfield SS, Barden TP, Mitchell J. Propiram and codeine in episiotomy pain. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology 19: 152–157, 1981
Boucsein W, Janke W. Experimentalpsychologische Untersuchungen zur Wirkung von Propiramfumarat und Promethazin unter Normal- und Streβbedingungen. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 675–693, 1974
Desjardins PJ, Cooper SA, Gallegos TL, Allwein JB, Reynolds DC, et al. The relative analgesic efficacy of propiram fumarate, codeine, aspirin and placebo in post-impaction dental pain. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 24: 35–42, 1984
Doenicke A, Feist HW, Kugler J. Psychoexperimerielle Leistungsvergleiche unter dem Einfluβ des Analgetikums Propiramfumarat. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 693–696, 1974
Duhm B, Maul W, Medenwald H, Patzschke K, Wegner LA. Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen zur Pharmakokinetik und biotransformation nach Verabreichung von radioktiv markiertem Propiramfumarat. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 632–643, 1974
Finch JS. Analgesic comparison of propiram fumarate with pentazocine, codeine and placebo in postsurgical pain. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 20: 689–692, 1980.
Forrest Jr WH, Brown CR, Katz J, Mahler DH, Shroff PF, et al. Combined routes of administration to assay oral analgesia in postoperative pain. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 16: 610–619, 1976
Forrest Jr WH, Brown CR, Shroff PF, Teutsch G. Relative potency of propiram and morphine for analgesia in man. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 12: 440–448, 1972
Gilbert PE, Martin WR. The effects of morphine and nalorphine-like drugs in the nondependent, morphine-dependent and cyclazocine-dependent chronic spinal dog. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 198: 66–82, 1976
Goldfrank L, Bresnitz E, Weisman R. Opioids and opiates. Heart and Lung 12: 114–122, 1983
Hoffmeister F, Kroneberg G, Schlichting U, Wuttke W. Zur Pharmakologie des Analgetikums Propiramfumarat [N-(1-Methyl-2-piperidino-äthyl)-N-(2-pyridyl)-propionamid-fumarat]. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 600–624, 1974
Hoffmeister F, Schlichting UU. Reinforcing properties of some opiates and opioids in rhesus monkeys with histories of cocaine and codeine self-administration. Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 23: 55–74, 1972
Hoffmeister F, Wuttke W. Negative reinforcing properties of morphine-agonists in naive rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 33: 247–258, 1973
Hoffmeister F. Wuttke W. Self administration: positive and negative reinforcing properties of morphine antagonists in rhesus monkeys. In Braude et al. (Eds) Narcotic antagonists. Raven Press, New York, Advances in Biochemical Psychopharmacology 8: 361–369, 1974
Horster FA, Duhm B, Maul H, Medenwald K, Patzschke K, et al. Klinische Untersuchungen zur Pharmakokinetik von Propiramfumarat-14C. Arzneimittel- Forschung 24: 652–656, 1974
Houde RW. Analgesic effectiveness of the narcotic agonist-antagonists. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 7: 297S–308S, 1979
Houde RW, Wallenstein SL, Rogers A. Analgesic studies in cancer patients: tilidine, propiram SU-19713B, levorphanol and nalbuphine. Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence Report: 116-130, 1974
Houde RW, Wallenstein SL, Rogers A, Kaiko RF. Annual report of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center analgesic studies section. pp. (169–185). Problems of Drug Dependence. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Scientific Meeting, July 6-9, 1977
Hullmann R, Sommer J, Hoffmeister F. Propiramfumarat in der Klinischen Prüfung. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 718–722, 1974
Jaffe JH, Martin WM. Opioid analgesics and antagonists. In Goodman and Gilman et al. (Eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics Vol. 1, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill Inc., Singapore, pp. 485–522, 1991
Jasinski DR, Martin WK, Hoeldtke R. Studies of the dependence-producing properties of GPA-1657, profadol and propiram in man. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 12: 613–649, 1971
Kempe W, Rheinwein I. Untersuchungen zur Wirkungsstärke des Analgetikums Propiramfumarat. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 661–666, 1974
Kollert W, Hullmann R, Sommer J. Kreislaufverhalten und EKG unter Propiramfumarat. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 701–707, 1974
Korduba CA, Veals J, Radwanski E, Symchowicz S, Chung M. Bioavailability of orally administered propiram fumarate in humans. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 70: 521–523, 1981
Kugler J, Wittman R, Doenicke A, Konrad T, Laub M. Elektroenze-phalographische Vigilanzbestimmungen nach DL-Propiramfumarat. Vergleiche mit Promethazin, Plazebo und Alkohol. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 696–700, 1974
Lennartz H, Drechsel U. Wirkung des neuen Analgetikums Propiramfumarat auf die Atmung. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 656–661, 1974
Lipp J. Possible mechanisms of morphine analgesia. Clinical Neuropharmacology 14: 131–147, 1991
Martin WR. Pharmacology of opioids. Pharmacological Reviews 35: 283–323, 1984
Martin WR, Eades CG, Thompson JA, Huppler RE, Gilbert PE. The effects of morphine- and nalorphine-like drugs in the non-dependent chronic spinal dog. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 197: 517–532, 1976
McQuarrie HG. Comparative analgesic efficacy of propiram, pentazocine, codeine and placebo in gynecological surgery patients. Current Therapeutic Research 29: 537–543, 1981
Michel CF. Die Anwendung von Propiramfumarat in der Geburtshilfe. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 673–675, 1974
Offermeier J, Van Rooyen JM. Opioid drugs and their receptors. A summary of the present state of knowledge. South African Medical Journal 66: 299–305, 1984
Pasternak GW. Pharmacological mechanisms of opioid analgesics. Clinical Neuropharmacology 16: 1–18, 1993
Paul D, Bodnar RJ, Gistrak MA, Pasternak GW. Different μ receptor subtypes mediate spinal and supraspinal analgesia in mice. European Journal of Pharmacology 168: 307–314, 1989
Pütter J, Kroneberg G. Chemische Untersuchungen zur Pharmakokinetik des Propiramfumarat. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 643–651, 1974
Rance MJ. Animal and molecular pharmacology of mixed agonistantagonist analgesic drugs. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 7: 281S–286S, 1979
Riethe P, Wilske E. Analgetische Effekte auf die Reizschwelle des menschlichen Zahnes. Arzneimittel-Forschung 24: 666–671, 1974
Saldana LR, Tabliago C, Beach E. Multiple-dose trial of oral propiram fumarate in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe pain. Current Therapeutic Research 28: 646–649, 1980
Sheehan MJ, Hayes AG, Tyers MB. Pharmacology of δ-opioid receptors in the hamster vas deferens. European Journal of Pharmacology 130: 57–64, 1986
Steinbrecher W. Zur Behandlung Schmerzhafter neurologischer Erkrankungen mit Propiramfumarat. Ein klinischer Erfahrungsbericht. Arzneimittel- Forschung 24: 708–718, 1974
Sunshine A, Laska EM, Olson NZ, Colon A, Gonzalez L, et al. Analgesic effects of oral propiram fumarate, codeine sulfate and placebo in postoperative pain. Pharmacotherapy 3: 299–303, 1983
Wilson RS, Landers JH. Use of a new oral analgesic, propiram fumarate, in treating postoperative ocular pain. Annals of Ophthalmology 14: 1172–1174, 1982
Wollweber H. Stereochemische Untersuchungen über Arzneimittel. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 17: 125–133, 1982
Wood PL. Multiple opiate receptors: support for unique mu, delta and kappa sites. Neuropharmacology 21: 487–497, 1982
Yanagita T. An experimental framework for evaluation of dependence liability of various types of drugs in monkeys. Bulletin of Narcotics 25: 57–64, 1973
Young AM, Stephens KR, Hein DW, Woods JH. Reinforcing and discriminative stimulus properties of mixed agonist-antagonist opioids. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 229: 118–126, 1984
Zola EM, McLeod DC. Comparative effects and analgesic efficacy of the agonist-antagonist opioids. Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy 17: 411–417, 1983
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: A.B. Baker, Department of Anaesthetics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; F.M. Borgbjerg, Pain Clinic, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; J.G. Bovrill, Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands; S.A. Cooper, Department of Biodental Sciences, New Jersey Dental School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA; J.B. Dahl, Department of Anaesthesiology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; R.B. Forbes, Department of Anaesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA; R.W. Houde, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA: I.G. Kestin, Department of Anaesthetics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, England; R.K. Portenoy, Pain Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; A.N. Sandier, Department of Anaesthesia, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; R.W. Shaw, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, Wales; J. W. Sloan, Department of Anesthesiology, Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA; M.A. Turturro, Department of Emergency Medicine, The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; T. Yanagita, First Department of Pharmacology, Jikel University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Z. Zylicz, Hospice Rozenheuvel, Doesburg, The Netherlands.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goa, K.L., Brogden, R.N. Propiram. Drugs 46, 428–445 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199346030-00008
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199346030-00008