Abstract

ABSTRACT:

Despite the importance of the ideological cleavage in Israel, there is a literary gap between the interpretation of Right-Wing positions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its vision for Israel and the Middle East. Based on a conceptual analysis of arguments articulated in Ribonut journal by diverse members of the Right-Wing elite, the article presents new empirical evidence for the unique narrative of the conflict by the Israeli Right that leads to an ideological rejection of a two-state solution and a preference for a one-state solution, unilateral annexation, and a limited expansion of Palestinian rights.

Share