-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
Snapshot Summary #1336
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Snapshot Summary #1336
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a summary feature for snapshots across the backend and frontend. A new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
frontend/src/components/SnapshotCard.tsx (1)
15-17
: Consider adding conditional rendering for the summary.The summary display looks good, but there's no handling for cases where
summary
might be undefined or empty. Consider adding conditional rendering to gracefully handle these cases.- <div className="mb-2 w-full text-xs text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-300 text-center"> - {summary} - </div> + {summary && ( + <div className="mb-2 w-full text-xs text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-300 text-center"> + {summary} + </div> + )}backend/apps/owasp/models/snapshot.py (2)
55-84
: Well-structured summary generation with room for optimization.The
generate_summary
method is well-structured and provides a clear, informative summary of snapshot data. However, consider these improvements:
- Add error handling for unexpected scenarios
- Consider performance optimization as each entity type requires a separate database query
Here's an improved version with error handling:
def generate_summary(self, max_examples=2): """Generate a snapshot summary with counts and examples. Args: max_examples: Maximum number of examples to show for each entity type. Returns: str: A formatted summary string with counts and examples of new entities. Note: This method performs multiple database queries which may impact performance with large datasets. """ summary_parts = [] def summarize(queryset, label, example_attr): try: count = queryset.count() if count == 0: return None examples = list(queryset.values_list(example_attr, flat=True)[:max_examples]) example_str = ", ".join(str(e) for e in examples) return f"{count} {label}{'s' if count != 1 else ''} (e.g., {example_str})" except Exception as e: # Log the error or handle it appropriately return f"Error processing {label}s: {str(e)}" entities = [ (self.new_users, "user", "login"), (self.new_projects, "project", "name"), (self.new_chapters, "chapter", "name"), (self.new_issues, "issue", "title"), (self.new_releases, "release", "tag_name"), ] for queryset, label, attr in entities: part = summarize(queryset, label, attr) if part: summary_parts.append(part) return ( "Snapshot Summary: " + "; ".join(summary_parts) if summary_parts else "No new entities were added." )
59-65
: Consider optimizing thesummarize
function for better performance.The current implementation calls
queryset.count()
and thenqueryset.values_list()
, resulting in two database queries per entity type. This could be optimized by fetching both the count and examples in a single query.def summarize(queryset, label, example_attr): count = queryset.count() if count == 0: return None - examples = list(queryset.values_list(example_attr, flat=True)[:max_examples]) + # Get both count and examples in one query + examples_queryset = queryset[:max_examples] + examples = [getattr(obj, example_attr) for obj in examples_queryset] example_str = ", ".join(str(e) for e in examples) return f"{count} {label}{'s' if count != 1 else ''} (e.g., {example_str})"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
backend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/snapshot.py
(2 hunks)backend/apps/owasp/models/snapshot.py
(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/SnapshotCard.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/server/queries/snapshotQueries.ts
(1 hunks)frontend/src/types/card.ts
(1 hunks)frontend/src/types/snapshot.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
backend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/snapshot.py (2)
backend/apps/github/models/release.py (1)
summary
(57-59)backend/apps/owasp/models/snapshot.py (1)
generate_summary
(55-84)
frontend/src/components/SnapshotCard.tsx (2)
frontend/src/types/card.ts (1)
SnapshotCardProps
(64-71)backend/apps/github/models/release.py (1)
summary
(57-59)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run CI/CD
frontend/src/components/SnapshotCard.tsx
[error] 1-1: Unstaged changes detected. Run make check
and use git add
to address it.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: CodeQL (python)
- GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
frontend/src/server/queries/snapshotQueries.ts (1)
66-66
: Good addition of the summary fieldThis change correctly adds the
summary
field to the GraphQL query, allowing the frontend to retrieve the summary data generated by the backend. This aligns with the changes made to the backend'sSnapshotNode
class and the TypeScript interfaces.frontend/src/types/card.ts (1)
70-70
: Appropriate type definition for summary propertyThe addition of the
summary
property to theSnapshotCardProps
interface is consistent with the changes to the GraphQL query. The type is correctly specified as a string.frontend/src/types/snapshot.ts (1)
26-26
: Consistent interface updateThe addition of the
summary
property to theSnapshots
interface matches the changes made to the GraphQL query and theSnapshotCardProps
interface. This ensures type safety throughout the application.backend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/snapshot.py (2)
25-25
: Field properly definedThe
summary
field is correctly defined usinggraphene.String()
, making it available in the GraphQL schema for queries.
60-62
: Resolver method looks goodThe resolver method correctly calls the
generate_summary
method to produce the snapshot summary. The implementation looks solid and maintains consistency with other resolvers in the class.Note that this uses the default
max_examples=2
parameter from thegenerate_summary
method, which is a reasonable default to keep summaries concise.frontend/src/components/SnapshotCard.tsx (2)
7-7
: Props destructuring includes the new summary parameter.The function signature has been updated to include the
summary
parameter, which matches theSnapshotCardProps
interface definition fromfrontend/src/types/card.ts
.
1-46
:❓ Verification inconclusive
Address the pipeline failure.
There's a pipeline failure indicating unstaged changes. Run
make check
to identify formatting issues or other changes that need to be addressed.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any unstaged changes in the frontend directory git status --porcelain -- frontend/Length of output: 37
Pipeline Issue: Verify Formatting and Unstaged Changes
Our verification usinggit status --porcelain -- frontend/
returned no unstaged changes. The pipeline failure might instead be related to formatting issues or other checks performed bymake check
. Please runmake check
locally to identify any formatting deviations or other issues, then address those if found.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run CI/CD
[error] 1-1: Unstaged changes detected. Run
make check
and usegit add
to address it.
def summarize(queryset, label, example_attr): | ||
count = queryset.count() | ||
if count == 0: | ||
return None | ||
examples = list(queryset.values_list(example_attr, flat=True)[:max_examples]) | ||
example_str = ", ".join(str(e) for e in examples) | ||
return f"{count} {label}{'s' if count != 1 else ''} (e.g., {example_str})" | ||
|
||
entities = [ | ||
(self.new_users, "user", "login"), | ||
(self.new_projects, "project", "name"), | ||
(self.new_chapters, "chapter", "name"), | ||
(self.new_issues, "issue", "title"), | ||
(self.new_releases, "release", "tag_name"), | ||
] | ||
|
||
for queryset, label, attr in entities: | ||
part = summarize(queryset, label, attr) | ||
if part: | ||
summary_parts.append(part) | ||
|
||
return ( | ||
"Snapshot Summary: " + "; ".join(summary_parts) | ||
if summary_parts | ||
else "No new entities were added." | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Add unit tests for the new functionality.
The generate_summary
method is a good candidate for unit testing to ensure it handles different data scenarios correctly.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are existing tests for the Snapshot model
echo "Checking for existing tests for Snapshot model..."
find backend -name "test_*.py" -o -name "*_test.py" | xargs grep -l "Snapshot" || echo "No existing tests found"
# Look for test patterns in the project
echo -e "\nExamining test patterns in the project..."
find backend -name "test_*.py" -o -name "*_test.py" | head -n 1 | xargs cat || echo "No test files found"
Length of output: 1868
Action Required: Add Dedicated Unit Tests for the generate_summary
Method
While there are existing tests for the Snapshot model (as seen in backend/tests/apps/owasp/models/snapshot_test.py
), it isn’t clear that the new generate_summary
functionality is specifically covered. Please add unit tests that ensure the method behaves correctly under various data conditions. For example:
- Test when the queryset returns zero records (should return "No new entities were added.").
- Test when there is exactly one record (ensuring the singular label is used).
- Test when multiple records are returned and the maximum examples limit (
max_examples
) is enforced.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
frontend/src/app/snapshots/[id]/page.tsx (3)
38-68
: Add error handling to the summary parser function.The parsing function works well for the expected format, but lacks error handling for edge cases.
const parseSnapshotSummary = (summary: string): ParsedSummary => { const result: ParsedSummary = { users: { count: 0, examples: [] }, projects: { count: 0, examples: [] }, chapters: { count: 0, examples: [] }, issues: { count: 0, examples: [] }, releases: { count: 0, examples: [] }, } if (!summary) return result const sections = [ { key: 'users', pattern: /(\d+) users \(e\.g\.,\s*([^)]+)\)/i }, { key: 'projects', pattern: /(\d+) projects \(e\.g\.,\s*([^)]+)\)/i }, { key: 'chapters', pattern: /(\d+) chapters \(e\.g\.,\s*([^)]+)\)/i }, { key: 'issues', pattern: /(\d+) issues \(e\.g\.,\s*([^)]+)\)/i }, { key: 'releases', pattern: /(\d+) releases \(e\.g\.,\s*([^)]+)\)/i }, ] sections.forEach((section) => { const match = summary.match(section.pattern) if (match && match.length >= 3) { + const count = parseInt(match[1], 10) result[section.key as keyof ParsedSummary] = { - count: parseInt(match[1], 10), + count: isNaN(count) ? 0 : count, - examples: match[2].split(',').map((s) => s.trim()), + examples: match[2] ? match[2].split(',').map((s) => s.trim()).filter(Boolean) : [], } } }) return result }
165-195
: Well-implemented summary section with responsive grid layout.The summary section is cleanly implemented with a responsive grid layout and consistent card styling. The conditional rendering ensures it only appears when data is available.
Consider extracting the summary card into a reusable component since all cards follow the same structure:
// Suggested component extraction (not for direct implementation) const SummaryCard = ({ label, count, examples, icon }) => ( <div className="flex items-start gap-4 rounded-lg border p-4 shadow-sm dark:border-gray-700"> <FontAwesomeIcon icon={icon} className="h-6 w-6 text-blue-500" /> <div> <h3 className="text-lg font-semibold text-gray-800 dark:text-gray-100"> {count} {label} </h3> <p className="text-sm text-gray-600 dark:text-gray-400"> {examples.length > 0 ? `e.g., ${examples.join(', ')}` : 'No examples available'} </p> </div> </div> );
187-189
: Handle empty examples array in summary cards.The current implementation doesn't handle the case where there are no examples for a category.
<p className="text-sm text-gray-600 dark:text-gray-400"> - e.g., {data.examples.join(', ')} + {data.examples.length > 0 ? `e.g., ${data.examples.join(', ')}` : 'No examples available'} </p>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/src/app/snapshots/[id]/page.tsx
(4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
- GitHub Check: Run backend tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
frontend/src/app/snapshots/[id]/page.tsx (6)
4-11
: Well-chosen icons for the summary section.The selected FontAwesome icons appropriately represent each entity type in the summary section (users, projects, chapters, issues, releases).
30-36
: Good type definition for parsed summary data.The
ParsedSummary
type provides a clear structure for the summary data with proper typing for counts and examples.
76-76
: Good addition of summary state.Adding a dedicated state variable for the parsed summary data follows good React practices by separating concerns.
84-87
: Properly updates state with parsed summary data.The component correctly integrates the new summary data into the state management flow.
138-147
: Simplified loading and error handling.The conditional rendering for loading and error states is now more concise and easier to follow.
209-209
: Good filtering for active chapters and projects.The addition of filtering for active chapters and projects ensures that only relevant items are displayed to the user.
Also applies to: 221-221
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/SnapshotDetails.test.tsx (1)
102-119
: Well-structured test case for new snapshot summary featureThe test case follows the existing patterns in the test file and effectively verifies that the new snapshot summary feature is correctly rendered. It checks for the presence of the summary heading and the specific entity counts that would be parsed from the summary string provided by the backend.
Consider also testing for the presence of the icons that accompany each statistic, since the AI summary mentions that the implementation includes displaying icons alongside the counts.
+ expect(screen.getByTestId('user-icon')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('project-icon')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('chapter-icon')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('issue-icon')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByTestId('release-icon')).toBeInTheDocument();This assumes that the icons have been assigned appropriate test IDs. If not, you might need to adapt the selectors based on how icons are actually implemented.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/SnapshotDetails.test.tsx
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Run backend tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
|
fixes: #1232