Skip to content

Use natural parameters when specifying uncertain distributions #893

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Remove statement about warning
  • Loading branch information
jamesmbaazam committed Dec 13, 2024
commit ed39b8de40ea2396fbd87470eec121616bd2083f
4 changes: 0 additions & 4 deletions vignettes/estimate_infections_workflow.Rmd.orig
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -102,10 +102,6 @@ which looks like this when plotted
```{r plot_uncertain_gamma}
plot(uncertain_gamma)
```

Note the warning about parameters.
We used the mean and standard deviation to define this distribution with uncertain parameters, but it would be better to use the "natural" parameters of the gamma distribution, shape and rate, for example using the values estimate and reported back after calling the previous command.

There are various ways the specific delay distributions mentioned below might be obtained.
Often, they will come directly from the existing literature reviewed by the user and studies conducted elsewhere.
Sometimes it might be possible to obtain them from existing databases, e.g. using the [epiparameter](https://github.com/epiverse-trace/epiparameter) R package.
Expand Down