Skip to content

Always make sysfs read-write with privileged #36808

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2018

Conversation

justincormack
Copy link
Contributor

It does not make any sense to vary this based on whether the
rootfs is read only. We removed all the other mount dependencies
on read-only eg see #35344.

Signed-off-by: Justin Cormack justin.cormack@docker.com

heron chicks

It does not make any sense to vary this based on whether the
rootfs is read only. We removed all the other mount dependencies
on read-only eg see moby#35344.

Signed-off-by: Justin Cormack <justin.cormack@docker.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 6, 2018

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@8a9e180). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 0%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #36808   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   34.93%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      614           
  Lines             ?    45648           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    15947           
  Misses            ?    27607           
  Partials          ?     2094

Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🐓

Copy link
Member

@cpuguy83 cpuguy83 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants