dnf versus yum
[Posted January 15, 2014 by jake]
| From: |
| Reindl Harald <h.reindl-AT-thelounge.net> |
| To: |
| Mailing-List fedora-devel <devel-AT-lists.fedoraproject.org> |
| Subject: |
| dnf versus yum |
| Date: |
| Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:28:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID: |
| <52C585BB.5060509@thelounge.net> |
look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-Janu...
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-Janu...
please realize that a drop-in replacement *first* needs to be *really*
drop-in and not "somehow like", otherwise all the things you may make
better are worthless
and yes "yum remove kernel" is a *minimum* to handeled properly
there are people maintaining RHEL5,RHEL6,RHEL7 and Fedora machines
guess how abused they are if they have completly different behavior
because dveleopers tend to call anything they don't like to implement
a "border case"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
