Timeline for 2018 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2018 at 0:23 | comment | added | user3956566 | @BoltClock yes perfect explanation! | |
| Mar 7, 2018 at 0:22 | comment | added | user3956566 | @TimPost interesting response to this question - your take on it is something different - cognitive biases (unconscious and the person isn't aware of it) - this is about say - someone from Country A + Religion X is upset and moderator knows nothing about this - it was used in a previous election. It really is a exemplar of the fickleness of meta. | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 16:21 | comment | added | BoltClock Mod | @Tim Post: "they can't be aware of what they don't know unless it has been pointed out to them" That's what the flag is for - making them aware. The question here is what the moderator does with the content taking into account the realization that the content may be objectionable to a group of people. | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 15:53 | comment | added | user50049 | It's hard to write this sort of thing in a way that doesn't seem antagonistic (note, I'm not answering your question here, I'm trying to help you word it a bit more effectively). The problem you're trying to suss out is that the moderator does not know of issues facing the group, so they can't be aware of what they don't know unless it has been pointed out to them. I think a better question might be something like "What do you feel is a good strategy to help ensure unconscious biases don't detract from the value and effectiveness of moderation?" -- something along that line? | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 1:51 | history | answered | user3956566 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |