Let's have a discussion, collectively.

Collectives are this weird bolt-on feature with overlaps on Q&A but also these other content options like Articles and Discussion. Given the current state of moderation tooling and guidance you can at best keep the Q&A at check and leave the rest to SE staff or their appointees.

At some point in time friction arises between the much leeway collectives have and the Q & As that you moderate. You're asked by a fair amount of tag subject matter experts who haven't joined the said collective to send a strong moderation signal that boundaries have been over-stepped.

What arguments will you use to convince the Company, their customer and others involved that the collective has to step up their quality game and sick to established consensus on curation to guarantee their Q and A will not be removed on sight.

Let's have a discussion, collectively.

Collectives are this weird bolt-on feature with overlaps on Q&A but also these other content options like Articles and Discussion. Given the current state of moderation tooling and guidance you can at best keep the Q&A at check and leave the rest to SE staff or their appointees.

At some point in time friction arises between the much leeway collectives have and the Q & As that you moderate. You're asked by a fair amount of tag subject matter experts who haven't joined the said collective to send a strong moderation signal that boundaries have been over-stepped.

What arguments will you use to convince the Company, their customer and others involved that the collective has to step up their quality game and stick to established consensus on curation to guarantee their Q and A will not be removed on sight?