Estimates of the timing of evolution of modern birds reveals the influence of paleogeography and paleoclimate on diversification.
Keywords: avian evolution, global biogeography, divergence times, diversification rates, K-Pg mass extinction
Abstract
Determining the timing of diversification of modern birds has been difficult. We combined DNA sequences of clock-like genes for most avian families with 130 fossil birds to generate a new time tree for Neornithes and investigated their biogeographic and diversification dynamics. We found that the most recent common ancestor of modern birds inhabited South America around 95 million years ago, but it was not until the Cretaceous-Paleogene transition (66 million years ago) that Neornithes began to diversify rapidly around the world. Birds used two main dispersion routes: reaching the Old World through North America, and reaching Australia and Zealandia through Antarctica. Net diversification rates increased during periods of global cooling, suggesting that fragmentation of tropical biomes stimulated speciation. Thus, we found pervasive evidence that avian evolution has been influenced by plate tectonics and environmental change, two basic features of Earth’s dynamics.
INTRODUCTION
Modern birds (Neornithes) are the most diverse group of terrestrial vertebrates in terms of their species richness and global distribution, yet we still have a poor understanding of their large-scale evolutionary history. Major advances in our knowledge of phylogenetic relationships have been made over the last decade (1–4), but the lack of a robust time tree, along with a comprehensive quantitative biogeographic analysis, has hindered progress toward a better understanding of the process of diversification in modern birds.
Determining the timing of avian diversification has been difficult. There is now a broad agreement that modern birds originated sometime in the Cretaceous (3, 5–8), but actual molecular age estimates vary from 72 mega-annum (Ma) (4) to 170 Ma (5), and fossils of indisputable neornithine affinities have only been found in the latest Cretaceous, about 67 Ma ago (9). Similarly, there is no agreement on the timing of diversification within the three major avian groups: Palaeognathae (tinamous and ratites), Galloanseres (waterfowl, pheasants, and allies), and the megadiverse Neoaves (all other birds); whereas most molecular estimates date the early radiation within these groups before the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) transition (5, 7, 10–14), with very few exceptions fossils have been found only after the K-Pg extinction event (6, 15–17). The possibility of a rapid post–K-Pg radiation of birds has led some to suggest a major effect of ecological opportunity on avian diversification due to the extinction of major competitors [the “big bang” model (13, 15)]. The big-bang model of avian diversification has received renewed attention because some recent molecular time trees recovered the rapid radiation of Neoaves as coinciding with the K-Pg event (3–5, 7); among them, time trees inferred using genomic data represent an important advancement because they overcame several drawbacks of previous analyses by using hundreds of loci and 19 fossil calibrations in Bayesian relaxed-clock analyses (3, 4). Previous estimates suffered from difficulties in modeling molecular evolution, due to reliance on few or misleading fossils or biogeographic events, or limitations of the analytical techniques available (7, 8). However, these genomic time trees depended on priors that restricted the maximum age of the tree based on expert opinion, and changing these priors changed the resultant time tree and the rapid radiation of Neoaves relative to the K-Pg event (19, 20).
Interwoven with questions about the temporal history of birds are those about their biogeographic history; in particular, did Gondwanan paleogeography play a significant role in their early diversification, and what historical events were associated with modern birds becoming globally distributed? With the broad acceptance of plate tectonics and the rise of phylogenetic thinking, it was proposed that multiple groups of birds arose on one or more Gondwanan continents (21–23). Although it is now widely acknowledged that some clades of birds, such as Passeriformes, are southern in origin (24, 25), the extensive Paleogene fossil record in the Northern Hemisphere is often interpreted as being in conflict with the southern origin of many, if not most, groups (15, 18, 26, 27). Biogeographic history also has important implications for the estimation of time trees. For example, the absence of fossil Neornithes in the Late Cretaceous Niobrara formation of North America has been used to constrain the maximum age of this clade (4), but if Neornithes originated on a different continent, this calibration may underestimate its age.
Here, we present a new estimate of the global avian time tree using an empirical approach to determine calibration priors. We also took advantage of recent advances in our understanding of phylogenetic relationships among extant (3, 28) and fossil (6, 29, 30) birds and used slowly evolving nuclear genes amenable to more tractable models of molecular evolution (3). The time tree is then used to explore spatial and temporal patterns of global avian diversification.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A new time tree for birds
We identified avian clades that have a relatively old and well-characterized fossil whose affinities are well established by phylogenetic analysis and/or derived morphologies. These fossils set a minimum bound for the stem age of the corresponding clade and its sister group (Fig. 1A) (31–33). However, phylogenetic divergence time estimation also requires constraints on the maximum age of clades; otherwise, an arbitrarily old tree would be compatible with any minimum bound. Maximum age constraints can be based on the absence of fossils in earlier fossiliferous beds, but the absence may reflect fossilization and recovery biases rather than true absence. For example, even if a detailed fossil record suggests the absence of a clade in the Paleocene of Europe, the clade may have originated earlier in another less-studied region such as South America. Fossil recovery biases can be quantified and incorporated into age estimates (34, 35) but not without theoretical and practical difficulties (32, 33). This problem is exacerbated by methods that constrain clade age based on maximum bounds (36–38) because bounds do not reflect the uncertainty associated with maximum age constraints. A better approach is to use probability density functions as priors in Bayesian analyses (32, 39), but choosing among different functions and the parameters of those functions has been a subjective and contentious issue (33, 40).
Fig. 1. Example of the method used for generating clade age priors from the fossil record.
(A) The fossil Wieslochia weissi from the Oligocene of Germany shows an apomorphy of the suborder Tyranni: a well-developed tuberculum ligamenti collateralis ventralis. Therefore, Wieslochia sets an absolute minimum age for the time of origin (stem age) of the Tyranni, which is the same as the crown age of Eupasseres. The oldest fossil of the suborder Passeri would also set a minimum age for Eupasseres, but it is younger than Wieslochia. Note that fossils that only show an apomorphy of Eupasseres may be in the stem branch; for this reason, they are not informative regarding the minimum age of crown Eupasseres. (B) The first record of Eupasseres (Tyranni or Passeri) in other continents completes a set of fossil occurrences of ages t1…tn (see data set 1 for details). (C) This set of ages does not depart significantly from a uniform distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, D = 0.25, P = 0.7). Therefore, the likelihood function for the upper bound (θ) of a uniform distribution [1/(θ)n for θ > tn] is used to generate a distribution for the true age of Eupasseres. (D) However, the oldest fossil does not have a precise age estimate but was assigned to a geological time interval that spans several million years (the same is true for other fossils in the set, but their ages do not influence the likelihood). Therefore, pseudosamples of tn are generated by sampling uniformly from the time interval to which the oldest fossil was assigned and used for generating multiple distributions of clade age. (E) Averaging these pseudoreplicated distributions results in a final distribution, which is then modeled with a standard probability density function that mimics its shape: a log-normal distribution, a log mean of 1.7, and a log SD of 0.8. This standard distribution is used as clade age prior in Bayesian divergence time estimation.
Here, we overcame these problems by empirically generating calibration priors based on the fossil record. We modeled clade age uncertainty based on distributions of fossils finds. A set of fossil ages t1…tn represents a sample from a distribution that has a maximum bound θ, which is the age of the clade. The objective is to obtain a probability distribution for the age θ. Several methods have been developed to estimate the stratigraphic range of taxa from observed fossil ages either by assuming simple distributions of fossil ages (41, 42) or by modeling fossil recovery potentials (34). In the simplest case, when fossil ages t1…tn are uniformly distributed, the likelihood of a hypothesized age θ is simply 1/θn for θ > tn (41, 43), and in the absence of prior information, this likelihood is proportional to the probability of θ (43).
An important factor that should be taken into account is the geographic dimension of the fossil record, which includes not only fossilization and exhumation biases but also the vagaries of dispersal and colonization processes. For example, a clade may have a temporally dense fossil record in a region including the oldest fossil of the clade worldwide; in a naïve assessment, this would suggest that the clade originated shortly before the age of its oldest fossil. However, if the clade originated in a different geographic region, this age estimate would correspond to the age of dispersion into the region, not the age of the clade. We minimized this problem by analyzing the fossil record at a large geographic scale using only the first fossil occurrence of a clade in each continent. Therefore, for each avian clade with a well-characterized old fossil, we determined the oldest fossil on each continent through bibliographic and database searches and kept only those clades whose set of ages do not depart from a uniform distribution (data set 1; table S1). We then parameterized probability density functions such that they matched the shape of the likelihood functions (fig. S1) and used them as clade age priors in Bayesian divergence time estimation (table S1; further details and extensions are explained in Fig. 1 and Materials and Methods).
We used the empirical priors derived above in Bayesian divergence time estimation in the program BEAST 2 (44), using a genomic data set of 1156 clock-like exons for 48 species from Jarvis et al. (3) and a data set with a much denser taxonomic representation of recombination-activating genes (RAG-1 and RAG-2) for 230 species representing 202 families and all avian orders. Both data sets resulted in very similar estimates of the avian time tree. Both placed the most recent common ancestor of extant birds in the early Late Cretaceous, with the genomic data set resulting in slightly older ages [median, 96.6 Ma; 95% highest posterior density (HPD), 84.2 to 114.3 Ma; Fig. 2A] than the RAG data set (median, 91.5 Ma; 95% HPD, 79.8 to 106.8 Ma; Fig. 2B). These estimates for the crown age of Neornithes are younger than most previous estimates (5, 10–12), but higher posterior densities overlap with the recent analysis of bird genomes (3), in which a maximum age constraint was assumed for the age of Neornithes at the Early-Late Cretaceous boundary. Our analysis recovered a relatively young age for Neornithes without prior constraints on its age.
Fig. 2. Time trees of modern birds from Bayesian divergence time estimation using fossil calibrations.
Maximum clade credibility (MCC) trees from a Bayesian divergence time estimation using calibration priors inferred from the fossil record. (A) MCC tree from the analysis of 124,196 bases from the first and second codon positions of 1156 clock-like genes from Jarvis et al. (3) and 10 calibration priors. (B) MCC tree from the analysis of 4092 bases of the recombination-activating genes for 230 species and 24 calibration priors. Black diamonds are calibration nodes, black dots are clades that were constrained to match relationships supported by recent multilocus and genomic analyses (3, 28), red density distributions are clade age prior probabilities derived empirically from a quantitative analysis of the fossil record of clades, and blue bars represent 95% highest posterior densities for node age from the posterior distribution. Median ages are indicated for large clades mentioned in the text (blue dots).
Radiation within the three major clades—Palaeognathae, Galloanseres, and Neoaves—began around the K-Pg transition (Fig. 2). Initial cladogenesis in Galloanseres and Neoaves occurred just before the K-Pg transition, whereas the timing of initial cladogenesis in Palaeognathae is poorly constrained and spans pre– and post–K-Pg times (Fig. 2). Overall, it is possible that initial radiation of these three major crown clades occurred more or less simultaneously around (and probably before) the K-Pg event, thus suggesting common causal factors. All avian orders originated during the Paleocene (median stem age; Fig. 2), except for Anseriformes and Galliformes, which originated in the latest Cretaceous, and some orders within the higher ratites, which may have originated in the late Paleocene or early Eocene, taking into account uncertainty.
Large-scale biogeographic history of birds
Next, we integrate phylogenetic relationships and the avian time tree with the spatial history of the major lineages of birds, set in the context of paleogeography and paleoclimatology. Because biogeographic history is far too complex to be inferred from ancestral reconstructions alone, our interpretations of the spatial history of birds are also derived from the joint geographic and temporal history among deep stem lineages (that is, avifaunas), the fossil record, phylogenetic and biogeographic patterns within clades, and how those data can be reconciled with Earth history.
We identified the geographic origin of Neornithes and of its three major subclades (Palaeognathae, Galloanseres, and Neoaves) to be West Gondwana, here taken to encompass a united continental South America, West Antarctica, and portions of East Antarctica (Fig. 3). This conclusion is robust to methodological assumptions (parsimony versus probabilistic modeling) and alternative tree topologies, with the exception that the likelihood reconstruction for the most recent common ancestor of Palaeognathae is ambiguous and includes both West Gondwana and the Palearctic (fig. S3). In addition to these basal groups, we reconstructed 22 major groups of Neornithes as being present in South America by the end of the middle Paleocene (~59.2 Ma) (Fig. 3 and table S2). Because of its taxonomic composition, this avifauna likely represented a broad sample of morphological and ecological diversity, from terrestrial lineages (ratites and stem-Gruiformes), freshwater and marine (stem-Charadriiformes, Sphenisciformes, Procellariiformes, and Phoenicopteriformes), predators (Cariamiformes and Falconiformes), nocturnal and aerial specialists (Caprimulgiformes), and arboreal groups (Coraciimorphae, Psittaciformes, and Passeriformes). The estimated mean ages indicate that this diverse assemblage was present very soon after the K-Pg, but uncertainties inherent in dating do not rule out the existence of some Neoavian lineages in the latest Cretaceous. The Paleocene avian radiation in South America was paralleled by a buildup of eutherian mammal diversity (45). West Gondwana would have been a large landmass in the latest Cretaceous and Paleocene, with predominantly warm, moist, equable climates (46) that would have facilitated the accumulation of diversity within a variety of environments, with a modern rainforest being established over a large portion of South America (45, 47, 48), and with warm to cool subtropical/temperate forests in the far south on Antarctica (46, 49).
Fig. 3. Time tree of modern birds with reconstruction of ancestral geographic regions.
Fitch parsimony optimizations of ancestral geographic regions are shown at the nodes. Multiple regions at a node represent alternative, equally parsimonious optimizations. The tree is the maximum clade credibility tree of a Bayesian analysis of recombination-activating genes for 230 species and 24 calibration priors and with the addition a posteriori of 25 fossil taxa that represent Holarctic distributions for clades now restricted to the tropics. Distributions at the tips are those of the clades they represent. Schematic representations of global paleogeography at the K-Pg transition, the middle Eocene, and the middle Miocene are shown together with major postulated interregional connections as inferred from paleogeographic evidence and biogeographic analysis. Higher-level taxa are indicated on the right (see fig. S2 for species names).
We hypothesize that Neornithes spread from West Gondwana to the rest of the world via two principal routes. The first route is a trans-Antarctic corridor that linked West Gondwana to Australia and Zealandia during the Cretaceous and early Paleogene (Fig. 3) (44). This corridor enabled the establishment of a widespread southern biota with a diversity of organisms, including plants (50), dinosaurs (51), mammals (52), and birds (Fig. 3 and table S2). The exact configuration of the land connection between South America and West Antarctica is uncertain, but this terrestrial corridor was potentially disrupted as early as ~50 Ma to as late as ~40 to 37 Ma, when a deep opening of the Drake Passage is inferred (53–56). Continental blocks comprising the corridor would have remained in proximity until ~30 Ma (55, 57).
Before ~83 Ma, Zealandia was conjugate to the eastern Australian margin and to West Antarctica in the south (58, 59). At that time, sea-floor spreading began in the Tasman Basin and south of the Campbell Plateau, severing a direct connection between Zealandia and West Antarctica, thus establishing the Tasman Gateway as the primary corridor for a K-Pg biota to enter Australia and then Zealandia (59). The South Tasman Rise did not rift from East Antarctica until the middle to late Eocene ~40 to 33 Ma; before then, the continental fragments comprising the South Tasman Rise were intermittently subaerial and shallow marine, with terrigenous sedimentation persisting through the Eocene (60, 61). Our results suggest that at least seven to nine major clades involving palaeognaths, Galloanseres, caprimulgiforms, and psittacopasseres (parrots and passerines) were shared with Australia before its separation from Antarctica (table S2). Two additional lineages, tree swifts (Hemiprocnidae; 95% HPD, 21.4 to 43.1 Ma) and the Kagu (Rhynochetidae) (95% HPD, 16.9 to 45.2 Ma), may have also been part of this interchange, considering age uncertainties. Previously, biogeographers had assumed that the ~83-Ma split between Zealandia and West Antarctica and the initial formation of the Tasman Sea implied that younger elements of the biota must have arisen via long-distance dispersal (23), but this assumption of a deep age for the Zealandia biota is no longer necessary (59). Rather, biogeographic patterns of deeper avian lineages were likely established by multiple episodes of vicariance within an early Tertiary biota that occupied Australia and emergent portions of Zealandia (table S2). The presence in Zealandia of two ancient lineages of flightless palaeognaths (kiwis and moas) [the flightless Kagu on New Caledonia and its flightless sister group (Aptornis) on New Zealand], as well as ancient lineages of parrots and passerines, is consistent with this interpretation.
We propose that there was a second Paleogene gateway for avifaunal expansion out of West Gondwana involving North America (here termed the North American Gateway hypothesis). Although it has long been assumed that there was a wide ocean barrier between South and Middle America through the Late Cretaceous and Paleogene until the Plio-Pleistocene, we hypothesize a northward avifaunal expansion at this time coincident with the first appearances of Laurasian metatherian and placental mammals in South America (45, 62), thus implying the presence of a land bridge. Although the paleogeographic setting of lower Middle America is complex and controversial, this interpretation is consistent with a growing number of tectonic models that posit a southern land bridge (63–65) that resulted from subduction, arc magnetism, and collisionary processes involving movement of the Galapagos large igneous province into the Caribbean, spanning K-Pg times.
Our results suggest a central role for North America as a gateway for biotic dispersion into the Holarctic, especially during the Paleocene to early/middle Eocene. Northern Hemisphere Paleogene environments were broadly tropical and subtropical at lower latitudes and subtropical-warm temperate at higher latitudes, especially toward the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (66–69). We infer that these avifaunas diversified within the Nearctic and spread into the Palearctic by the end of the Paleocene and earliest Eocene ~56 to 53 Ma (Fig. 3 and table S2).
The biogeographic analyses suggest that North America played a formative role in the origins of lineages that subsequently diversified in the Old World. Thus, the Green River Formation (53 to 51 Ma) (70) in North America and the Fur Formation (55 to 54 Ma) (71) and Messel oil shales (47 Ma) (29) in Europe record many of the stem lineages that were elements of a widely distributed Paleogene avifauna (table S2). The time tree is consistent with these lineages having initiated diversification before deposition of these fossils. For example, instead of the Coraciimorphae arising in Africa (72), our optimizations indicate that Leptosomatiformes, Coliiformes, and Coraciiformes colonized the Paleotropics independently from North American ancestors (Fig. 3). Given the presence of many of these lineages in the early Paleogene of Europe, we infer that they reached the western Palearctic through a North Atlantic corridor before ~52 Ma (table S2). The tectonic history of the North Atlantic in the Paleogene indicates land connections among northeastern North America, Greenland, and Europe (73, 74), and paleontological evidence records mammalian faunal interchange until sometime in the early Eocene (68, 75), when sea-floor spreading between northeastern Greenland and Europe would have created an ocean barrier ~53 to 52 Ma (73, 76).
Expansion into other Old World landmasses is more difficult to circumscribe temporally and geographically. The avian Paleogene record for Africa is sparse, and that for Madagascar is lacking entirely (29). Some old stem clades now characteristic of these two land masses are found in the North American or European fossil record (29). Both Malagasy endemic cuckoo rollers (Leptosomatiformes) and true rollers (Coracioidea) have Holarctic Paleogene records, but when they did arrive in Africa or Madagascar is unclear. Our reconstructions suggest that lineages arrived in Madagascar in the Paleocene (mesites, Mesitornithidae), the Eocene (ground rollers, Brachypteraciidae), and the Oligocene (vangas, Vangidae; Fig. 3), suggesting that the buildup of the Malagasy endemic avifauna may have been a protracted process that spanned at least the entire Paleogene.
A second route from North America to the Old World—the Bering land bridge—would have been emergent over much of the Tertiary and, depending on eustatic sea levels and high-latitude temperature gradients, would have facilitated frequent biotic interchange between Asia and North America (77, 78). However, a Beringian corridor for Paleogene avifaunas is not evident in our analysis, partly as a result of a poor fossil record in northern Asia. Cranes and their allies (Gruiformes) provide an exception, with Eocene-Oligocene fossil families Geranoididae in North America and Eogruidae in Asia showing close affinities (29). Several other stem lineages associated with the North Atlantic corridor may also have had Paleogene histories across Beringia, including stem-Struthioniformes (ostriches) and Caprimulgiformes such as frogmouths (Podargidae) and swifts (Apodidae) (Supplementary Materials).
A novel implication of the North American Gateway hypothesis is that the roots of the “Old World” suboscines (Eurylaimides) are in the New World. Four well-supported lineages are known, but their interrelationships are uncertain (79, 80). One of these lineages is Sapayoa aenigma of the rainforests of eastern Panama and northwestern Colombia. The other three lineages are tropical African–Southeast Asian lineages, with a few young species reaching Australasia. We estimate the crown radiation of Eurylaimides to be ~37 Ma; thus, biogeography and age suggest that one lineage or possibly two lineages independently colonized the Old World, with Sapayoa being relictual. If our estimate for the age of crown Eurylaimides at ~37 Ma is correct, then it implies that these lineages entered the paleotropics via Beringia, not across the North Atlantic.
A key event in avian evolution was the diversification of songbirds (Passeri). Our reconstructions indicate that dispersion into East Gondwana of the Acanthisitti probably occurred independently of Passeri (25, 81) (Fig. 3), and we place the most recent common ancestor of the latter on the Australian landmass at 47.3 Ma (HPD, 43.1 to 51.6), which is younger than current estimates (24, 82, 83). Over the next 5 to 7 Ma, oscines underwent substantial phenotypic and ecological evolution in greater Australia; by ~40 Ma, this had resulted in the endemic corvidan radiation and early lineages that reached Zealandia (Fig. 3). Contemporaneously, oscine lineages were transferred from Australia to Southeast Asia and Africa, including the Eupetidae (40.6 Ma) and the Promeropidae (39.5 Ma), the sister group of the Laurasian Passerides (Fig. 3). These lineages mark the beginnings of the great passeridan radiation across the paleotropics, Eurasia, and eventually the New World (25). This early Australian-Asian exchange also involved lineages of corvidans, including at least stem-vireonids (34.6 Ma), campephagids (34.4 Ma), and pachycephalids (31.7 Ma). These ages are coincident in time with the early northward drift of Australia and are estimates of the origin of stem lineages, not of crown clades, which are younger (for example, the crown age for Eupetidae is 26.8 Ma). By the early Oligocene (around 33.9 Ma), portions of northwestern continental Australia were adjacent to Asia, and collision followed in the Miocene (84, 85). In addition, the Miocene-Pliocene left-lateral motion along the Sorong Fault transported continental slivers to the west toward Asia. Thus, hypotheses of long-distance dispersal across wide ocean gaps (83, 86) may not be necessary to explain this complex avifaunal interchange. Once in tropical Asia by the late Eocene, each of the major songbird lineages radiated extensively into the Oligocene and early Miocene environments of the Afrotropics and Eurasia (Fig. 3) (25, 83, 86). Many lineages then entered North America at various times across an emergent Bering land bridge (25).
Temporal dynamics of avian diversification
To explore the effects of Earth history on avian diversification dynamics, we analyzed changes in diversification rates through time. We found that net diversification rates (speciation − extinction) track changes in global climate over the entire timespan of modern bird evolution: rates increase during periods of climate cooling and decrease during periods of climate warming (Fig. 4A). Relative extinction (extinction/speciation) was low, and periods of increased extinction coincide with periods of high net diversification (Fig. 4B), suggesting that the overall dynamics is dominated by changes in rates of speciation. Environment-dependent birth-death likelihood models, in which diversification rates are functions of a time-dependent environmental variable (87), also indicate that rates of speciation and extinction are negatively correlated with global temperature (table S3).
Fig. 4. Diversification rates through time for modern birds and major events in Earth history during the Late Cretaceous and the Cenozoic.
(A) Red: Net lineage diversification rate (speciation-extinction) estimated for 5-Ma intervals using birth-death shifts models (120) (lines are medians of 500 estimates from a sample of the posterior distribution of trees from the Bayesian time-tree analysis; light boxes around medians are interquartile ranges). Blue: Deep-ocean temperatures estimated from a global compilation of benthic foraminifera oxygen isotope data (124) represented by a local regression smoother and associated 95% confidence intervals. Major tectonic and meteorite events are also indicated. (B) Relative extinction rate (extinction/speciation) (lines are medians, and light boxes around medians are interquartile ranges from 500 estimates from the tree posterior).
We propose that this macroevolutionary dynamics is largely the result of climate change inducing biome fragmentation and vicariance (that is, climate-induced vicariance). During major cooling trends of the Late Cretaceous (88) and the Cenozoic (89), tropical biomes would have experienced successive waves of retraction and fragmentation (49, 66, 67), which resulted in population fragmentation and increased risk of extinction across entire faunas, but also increased chances of speciation among the newly isolated populations (90). Thus, provided that speciation rates were higher than extinction rates, this scenario results in higher net diversification of entire avifaunas during periods of climate deterioration. Conversely, expansion of thermophilic forests during warm periods (49, 66, 67) promoted connectivity and homogenization of avifaunas (also suggested by a wave of worldwide dispersion; Fig. 3), a phenomenon also documented among austral fossil floras (91) and boreal mammalian faunas (68, 75). The final burst of diversification in our analysis occurred soon after the middle Miocene cooling episode, which is associated with global retraction of tropical and mesic biomes and expansion of steppes and deserts (92–95). Therefore, the middle Miocene cooling may have fragmented distributions and increased diversification of not only humid tropical but also subtropical and mesic taxa.
Although climate-induced vicariance predicts a final major burst of diversification during Pleistocene glaciations, this burst cannot be detected in our time tree because of sampling (that is, there are no branching events in the last 10 Ma). That most avian time trees show slowdowns in diversification toward the present (95) seems to falsify this prediction, but apparent slowdowns are likely to be artifacts of nucleotide model misspecification (96), deep gene-tree coalescence (97), and incomplete species sampling (98). Alternatively, climate-induced vicariance can also be compatible with low diversification during the Pleistocene if extinction rates increased more than speciation rates, thus dampening net diversification. Complete and calibrated species trees are needed to resolve this matter.
Other events in Earth history may also have influenced diversification rates in Neornithes. In particular, the rate increase at the end of the Cretaceous occurred near the K-Pg transition, suggesting a possible association with the K-Pg extinction event. Although the rate increase started before the K-Pg transition, coinciding with the latest Cretaceous cooling trend, the magnitude of the rate increase suggests a role for the K-Pg event in increasing rates further. The extent of this effect and its particular mechanisms requires further investigation. Although the K-Pg event marked the extinction of close relatives such as Enantiornithes and basal Ornithurae, the extent to which it affected modern birds directly is unclear from the fossil record because of the scarcity of Neornithes remains before and after the event (6, 17, 29, 96). Our biogeographic reconstructions suggest that Neornithes occupied West Gondwanan continents during the K-Pg transition and, therefore, like other animals and plants (91, 97, 98), may have escaped the catastrophic effects of the impact. On the other hand, if multiple early lineages of Neornithes faced extinction during the K-Pg event, that may have created a false signal of rate increase in the reconstructed phylogenies, in which case the apparent increase is merely a consequence of missing lineages before the event (99, 100). Finally, the big-bang model posits that surviving lineages of Neornithes would have experienced ecological opportunity that may have stimulated diversification (15, 18). In any case, catastrophic extinction events may not be general drivers of diversification in modern birds because they cannot explain changes in diversification rates over most of the Cenozoic (fig. S4). Thus, there are no major meteorite impacts, volcanism, or mass extinctions in the Miocene, when diversification rates increased dramatically (Fig. 4A and fig. S4). Our data suggest, in contrast, that global changes in climate are correlated with changes in diversification rates throughout the entire history of modern birds. Statistical comparison of diversification models also favors climate over extinction events as drivers of avian diversification (Supplementary Materials). Ultimately, we cannot reject a potential effect of the K-Pg mass extinction event on modern bird diversification, but further research on this matter should consider the potentially pervasive background effect of climate-induced vicariance on diversification.
Climate-induced vicariance may have a prominent role in controlling macroevolutionary rates (90), but it may be difficult to detect in paleontological data sets. Actually, except for a clear signal of mass extinctions associated with catastrophic events, general drivers of temporal macroevolutionary dynamics in terrestrial tetrapods have been difficult to identify (87, 101–103). Climate-induced vicariance may be obscured in paleontological data sets because it results in speciation in fragmented populations that are difficult to detect in a geographically sparse fossil record (104). Conversely, during benign climates, populations expand and have higher chances of being detected, resulting in a bias in which new species remain undetected until they expand during warm periods. This hinders the detection of climate-induced vicariance and creates a false signal of positive associations between diversification and warming in the fossil record.
Climate-induced vicariance has received considerable attention in microevolutionary studies of diversification. There is now widespread evidence of population differentiation and speciation associated with habitat fragmentation and biogeographic refugia (105–110). Climate-induced vicariance also explains how niche conservatism might stimulate speciation (111). Finally, analyses of geographic variation in diversification rates among extant birds also suggest higher speciation and extinction rates in regions with harsher climates (14, 112, 113). Therefore, climate-induced vicariance may explain avian diversification through space and time, providing a unified framework for understanding large-scale biodiversity dynamics in birds.
CONCLUSIONS
We generated a new time tree for modern birds that revealed striking patterns of their evolutionary history. We found that modern birds originated in the early Late Cretaceous in Western Gondwanan continents but did not diversify much until the K-Pg transition. This, combined with the poor overall quality of the Late Cretaceous avian fossil record (96), explains in part the scarcity of fossils of modern birds in the Cretaceous, thus partially resolving the “clocks versus rocks” controversy. Modern birds expanded from West Gondwana to the rest of the world through two routes. One route was a trans-Antarctic interchange during the Paleogene that resulted in the presence of multiple avian groups in Australia and Zealandia. The other route was a North American Gateway, facilitated by an inter-American land bridge during the Paleocene that allowed expansion and diversification of modern birds into the Holarctic and eventually the Paleotropics. The North American Gateway hypothesis explains the presence of numerous neoavian groups in the Eocene of North America and Europe without the need to postulate northern origins for these groups or to reject the importance of Gondwana in early avian evolution.
The new time tree also reveals a striking pattern in which avian net diversification rates increased during periods of global climatic deterioration. This pattern is consistent with a model of climate-induced vicariance in which biome fragmentation triggers speciation pulses across entire avifaunas. Thus, initial rapid radiation of Palaeognathae, Galloanseres, and especially Neoaves can be explained by the Late Cretaceous cooling trend, with perhaps additional effects of the K-Pg mass extinction. Overall, the new time tree reveals that the historical biogeography and diversification dynamics of modern birds was tightly linked to the paleogeographic and climatic history of planet Earth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Estimation of clade age from the fossil record
If fossil occurrences belonging to a clade are uniformly distributed between the present and the time of origin of the clade θ, the likelihood of a hypothesized age θ given the observed fossil age occurrences t1…tn is simply 1/θn for times older than the oldest fossil tn (41, 43). This likelihood is proportional to the probability density of θ in the absence of prior information (43). Instead of using the present as the baseline, the age of the most recent fossil can be used as the baseline, in which case the likelihood becomes 1/(θ − t1)n − 1 for θ > tn (42). Therefore, the likelihood depends on the age of the oldest fossil tn, the number of fossil occurrences n, and the timespan encompassing those occurrences (θ − t1). The higher the number of fossil occurrences n and the narrower the timespan between the youngest fossil and clade age, the higher the concentration of the likelihood near the oldest fossil tn. Then, a probability density function is parameterized in a way that replicates the shape of the likelihood. This probability density function can be implemented as a clade age prior in molecular Bayesian divergence time estimation. We also considered the case in which fossil ages have uncertainty, specifically when the oldest or youngest fossils are assigned to a geological time interval that spans more than 1 Ma. In such cases, we uniformly sampled pseudoreplicated sets of fossil ages from the time interval, estimated likelihood distributions for clade age, and computed an average probability distribution across pseudoreplicates. The methodology is explained with an example in Fig. 1. Functions for generating empirical calibration priors from the fossil record in the R language are available at https://github.com/evolucionario/cladeage.
Phylogenetic time-tree analysis
We conducted a Bayesian time-tree estimation in the program BEAST 2 (44) using two molecular data sets: one that emphasizes genomic coverage and another that emphasizes taxonomic coverage. The genome-scale data set consisted of the first and second codon positions of 1156 clock-like exons for 48 species from Jarvis et al. (3), which we filtered for missing data (positions with missing data or gaps for any taxa were deleted), and resulted in a final alignment of 124,196 bases. To maximize taxonomic coverage, we used sequences of the slowly evolving recombination-activating genes (RAG-1 and RAG-2) for 230 species representing 202 families and all avian orders (alignment length, 4092 bases). Amplification and sequencing protocols for new RAG sequences followed previous studies of avian RAGs (25). For the RAG alignment, we determined an optimal substitution model and partitioning scheme simultaneously using the PartitionFinder algorithm (114). The genomic data set was analyzed under a single GTR+ gamma substitution model. Bayesian inference was performed using BEAST 2 (44). Rate heterogeneity across lineages was modeled with a relaxed lognormal clock (39). Priors on rates of substitution and clocks were set to defaults (as in Beauti 2.1). We ran analyses using a birth-death tree prior with incomplete sampling that takes into account the fact that we sampled a small fraction of all avian diversity (Supplementary Materials). Priors on calibration clades were set using exponential or log-normal functions, with parameters chosen as to mimic the empirical density distributions for the origin of clades (fig. S1 and table S1). We ran analyses without sequence data to evaluate the behavior of calibration priors (115). The tree topology of the RAG data set was estimated together with divergence times, except for some clades (Fig. 2B) that were constrained to match relationships supported by recent multilocus and genomic analyses (3, 28). The tree of the genomic analysis was fixed to the ExaML Total Evidence Nucleotide Tree topology of Jarvis et al. (3). Posterior samples were obtained from six independent Markov chain Monte Carlo runs of 80 million generations, each of which sampled every 8000 generations for the RAG data set, and from four runs of 60 million generations sampled every 6000 generations for the genomic data set. Adequacy of sampling and convergence was evaluated by examining the traces and effective sample sizes of likelihoods and parameters.
Ancestral area reconstruction
We divided the globe into eight regions that reflect both current global distributional patterns and major continental plates to ensure that area definitions are meaningful throughout the Cenozoic (Supplementary Materials). We assigned regions to the tips of the tree based on the current distribution of the clades they represent (data set 2). Regions were coded as different states of a single character, and clades distributed across multiple regions were treated as “polymorphic.” We reconstructed ancestral areas using Fitch parsimony, a nonparametric method that implies an island model (116). This method assumes geographic transitions rather than agglomeration of ancestral areas and is appropriate when transitions are rare (116, 117)—two conditions that may be more appropriate for large biogeographic regions because most avian species are restricted to single continents among which dispersal events are rare. In addition, more complex methods require complete phylogenies in which the tips of the tree are individual lineages (116, 118). In the present case, because the tips of the tree are solely representatives of clades, some of which are large, statistical methods may result in biased parameter estimates, compromising ancestral area estimation. Parsimony optimizations were obtained using the function ancestral.pars in the phangorn library (119) with the option MPR to obtain all possible parsimony reconstructions. Nevertheless, to explore the effect of methodological assumptions, we also used a probabilistic dispersal-vicariance likelihood model implemented in the library BioGeoBEARS in R (118) (Supplementary Materials). We also explored the effect of using an alternative tree topology (4) (Supplementary Materials). The fossil record indicates that many taxa, which are today restricted to tropical latitudes, were once present in the northern continents (29); therefore, including only extant taxa can bias ancestral reconstructions toward tropical areas. To minimize this bias, we added 25 fossil taxa to the tree representing Holarctic distributions for clades now restricted to the tropics (data set 2). Fossil taxa were attached at the midpoint between their age and the stem age of the clade to which they belong, using a new R function (available at https://github.com/evolucionario/fossilgraft), and treated as terminals in biogeographic reconstructions.
Diversification dynamics analysis
To analyze variation in diversification rates through time, we estimated rates for 5-Ma intervals using the results of the RAG data set and the function bd.ME.optim in the TreePar library (120). We analytically accounted for missing taxa using the option “groups” (121) in which we specified the actual number of species in taxa represented by each terminal of the tree; the richness of each terminal taxon was estimated using current taxonomic knowledge (122, 123) and can be found in data set 2. We also fitted environment-dependent birth-death models in which diversification rates are functions of a time-dependent environmental variable (87): we modeled different scenarios in which speciation or extinction rates vary through time as functions of changes in paleotemperatures. Deep-sea paleotemperatures were derived from a global compilation of benthic foraminifera oxygen isotope (δ18O) data (124) and new estimating equations (125). Rate dependency on global temperature could be linear [r(t) = r0 + αT(t)] or exponential [r(t) = r0eαT(t), in which r0 and α are estimated parameters and T(t) is a function that describes changes in temperature over time, in this case, a smooth-spline function with 50 degrees of freedom of deep-ocean temperature data].
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the Burke Museum for providing important tissue samples, G. F. Barrowclough for sharing DNA extractions and sequences, and W. M. Mauck and J. McKay for generating additional DNA sequences. We thank B. T. Smith and R. MacPhee for comments on an early version of the manuscript and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the submitted version. Funding: This work was supported by the F. M. Chapman Fund (American Museum of Natural History) and the U.S. National Science Foundation (awards 1241066 and 1146423 to J.C.). Author contributions: S.C. and J.C. conceived the study. S.C. devised and implemented the clade age prior estimation method and diversification analyses, and compiled the fossil, richness, and biogeographic data sets. S.C. and J.C. designed and conducted the time-tree analyses and biogeographic reconstructions. S.C. and J.C. wrote the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors. New sequences were deposited in GenBank (KT954347 to KT954541), whereas alignments and maximum clade credibility trees were deposited in TreeBASE (http://treebase.org; submission 17445). Databases of fossils used for calibration (data set 1) and the biogeographic and species richness data (data set 2) are available as online supplementary materials.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1/11/e1501005/DC1
Text
Fig. S1. Probability density distributions for the age of the most recent common ancestor (crown age) of 24 avian clades in the RAG data set inferred from the distribution of fossil occurrences.
Fig. S2. Biogeographic ancestral area reconstruction using Fitch parsimony optimization.
Fig. S3. Alternative biogeographic ancestral area reconstructions.
Fig. S4. Diversification through time of modern birds and Earth history events.
Fig. S5. Effect of the tree prior on Bayesian divergence time estimation.
Table S1. Probability distributions of clade age from fossil occurrences, used as calibration priors in Bayesian divergence time analysis in BEAST 2.
Table S2. Reconstructions of the taxonomic composition of Late Cretaceous–Cenozoic global avifaunas.
Table S3. Environmental birth-death models of the associations between diversification rates and global temperature in modern birds.
Table S4. Birth-death shift models representing associations between Earth history events and diversification rates in modern birds.
Data set 1. Fossils used for calibration.
Data set 2. Biogeographic and richness information.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.J. Cracraft, in The Howard & Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1, E. C. Dickinson, L. Christidis, Eds. (Aves Press, Eastbourne, UK, ed. 4, 2013), pp. 21–43. [Google Scholar]
- 2.J. Cracraft, in The Howard & Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 2, E. C. Dickinson, L. Christidis, Eds. (Aves Press, Eastbourne, UK, ed. 4, 2014), pp. 17–45. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jarvis E. D., Mirarab S., Aberer A. J., Li B., Houde F., Li C., Ho S. Y., Faircloth B. C., Nabholz B., Howard J. T., Suh A., Weber C. C., da Fonseca R. R., Li J., Zhang F., Li H., Zhou L., Narula N., Liu L., Ganapathy G., Boussau B., Bayzid M. S., Zavidovych V., Subramanian S., Gabaldón T., Capella-Gutiérrez S., Huerta-Cepas J., Rekepalli B., Munch K., Schierup M., Lindow B., Warren W. C., Ray D., Green R. E., Bruford M. W., Zhan X., Dixon A., Li S., Li N., Huang Y., Derryberry E. P., Bertelsen M. F., Sheldon F. H., Brumfield R. T., Mello C. V., Lovell P. V., Wirthlin M., Schneider M. P., Prosdocimi F., Samaniego J. A., Vargas Velazquez A. M., Alfaro-Núñez A., Campos P. F., Petersen B., Sicheritz-Ponten T., Pas A., Bailey T., Scofield P., Bunce M., Lambert D. M., Zhou Q., Perelman P., Driskell A. C., Shapiro B., Xiong Z., Zeng Y., Liu S., Li Z., Liu B., Wu K., Xiao J., Yinqi X., Zheng Q., Zhang Y., Yang H., Wang J., Smeds L., Rheindt F. E., Braun M., Fjeldsa J., Orlando L., Barker F. K., Jønsson K. A., Johnson W., Koepfli K. P., O’Brien S., Haussler D., Ryder O. A., Rahbek C., Willerslev E., Graves G. R., Glenn T. C., McCormack J., Burt D., Ellegren H., Alström P., Edwards S. V., Stamatakis A., Mindell D. P., Cracraft J., Braun E. L., Warnow T., Jun W., Gilbert M. T., Zhang G., Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346, 1320–1331 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Prum R. O., Berv J. S., Dornburg A., Field D. J., Townsend J. P., Lemmon E. M., Lemmon A. R., A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526, 569–573 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ericson P. G. P., Anderson C. L., Britton T., Elzanowski A., Johansson U. S., Källersjö M., Ohlson J. I., Parsons T. J., Zuccon D., Mayr G., Diversification of Neoaves: Integration of molecular sequence data and fossils. Biol. Lett. 2, 543–547 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mayr G., The origins of crown group birds: Molecules and fossils. Palaeontology 57, 231–242 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ksepka D. T., Phillips M. J., Avian diversification patterns across the K-Pg boundary: Influence of calibrations, datasets, and model misspecification. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 100, 300–328 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 8.J. W. Brown, M. van Tuinen, in Living Dinosaurs: The Evolutionary History of Modern Birds, G. Dyke, G. Kaiser, Eds. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2011), pp. 306–324. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clarke J. A., Tambussi C. P., Noriega J. I., Erickson G. M., Ketcham R. A., Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. Nature 433, 305–308 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brown J. W., Rest J. S., García-Moreno J., Sorenson M. D., Mindell D. P., Strong mitochondrial DNA support for a Cretaceous origin of modern avian lineages. BMC Biol. 6, 6 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pereira S. L., Baker A. J., A mitogenomic timescale for birds detects variable phylogenetic rates of molecular evolution and refutes the standard molecular clock. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 1731–1740 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Haddrath O., Baker A. J., Multiple nuclear genes and retroposons support vicariance and dispersal of the palaeognaths, and an Early Cretaceous origin of modern birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 4617–4625 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Harrison G. L., McLenachan P. A., Phillips M. J., Slack K. E., Cooper A., Penny D., Four new avian mitochondrial genomes help get to basic evolutionary questions in the Late Cretaceous. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 974–983 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jetz W., Thomas G. H., Joy J. B., Hartmann K., Mooers A. O., The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Feduccia A., ‘Big bang’ for tertiary birds? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 172–176 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ksepka D. T., Ware J. L., Lamm K. S., Flying rocks and flying clocks: Disparity in fossil and molecular dates for birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281, 20140677 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Longrich N. R., Tokaryk T., Field D. J., Mass extinction of birds at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 15253–15257 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Feduccia A., Avian extinction at the end of the Cretaceous: Assessing the magnitude and subsequent explosive radiation. Cretac. Res. 50, 1–15 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mitchell K. J., Cooper A., Phillips M. J., Comment on “Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds”. Science 349, 1460 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cracraft J., Houde P., Ho S. Y., Mindell D. P., Fjeldså J., Lindow B., Edwards S. V., Rahbek C., Mirarab S., Warnow T., Gilbert M. T., Zhang G., Braun E. L., Jarvis E. D., Response to comment on “Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds”. Science 349, 8–10 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Keast A., Continental drift and the evolution of the biota on southern continents. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 335–378 (1971). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cracraft J., Continental drift, paleoclimatology, and the evolution and biogeography of birds. J. Zool. 169, 455–543 (1973). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cracraft J., Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous–Tertiary mass extinction event. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268, 459–469 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ericson P. G. P., Christidis L., Cooper A., Irestedt M., Jackson J., Johansson U. S., Norman J. A., A Gondwanan origin of passerine birds supported by DNA sequences of the endemic New Zealand wrens. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269, 235–241 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Barker F. K., Cibois A., Schikler P., Feinstein J., Cracraft J., Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 11040–11045 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.S. L. Olson, in Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici (Vol. 2), H. Ouellet, Ed. (University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, Canada, 1988), pp. 2023–2029. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mayr G., Two-phase extinction of “Southern Hemispheric” birds in the Cenozoic of Europe and the origin of the Neotropic avifauna. Palaeobiodivers. Palaeoenviron. 91, 325–333 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hackett S. J., Kimball R. T., Reddy S., Bowie R. C., Braun E. L., Braun M. J., Chojnowski J. L., Cox W. A., Han K. L., Harshman J., Huddleston C. J., Marks B. D., Miglia K. J., Moore W. S., Sheldon F. H., Steadman D. W., Witt C. C., Yuri T., A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320, 1763–1768 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.G. Mayr, Paleogene Fossil Birds (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2009). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ksepka D. T., Boyd C. A., Quantifying historical trends in the completeness of the fossil record and the contributing factors: An example using Aves. Paleobiology 38, 112–125 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marshall C. R., The fossil record and estimating divergence times between lineages: Maximum divergence times and the importance of reliable phylogenies. J. Mol. Evol. 30, 400–408 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ho S. Y. W., Phillips M. J., Accounting for calibration uncertainty in phylogenetic estimation of evolutionary divergence times. Syst. Biol. 58, 367–380 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Parham J. F., Donoghue P. C., Bell C. J., Calway T. D., Head J. J., Holroyd P. A., Inoue J. G., Irmis R. B., Joyce W. G., Ksepka D. T., Patané J. S., Smith N. D., Tarver J. E., van Tuinen M., Yang Z., Angielczyk K. D., Greenwood J. M., Hipsley C. A., Jacobs L., Makovicky P. J., Müller J., Smith K. T., Theodor J. M., Warnock R. C., Benton M. J., Best practices for justifying fossil calibrations. Syst. Biol. 61, 346–359 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Marshall C. R., Confidence intervals on stratigraphic ranges with nonrandom distributions of fossil horizons. Paleobiology 23, 165–173 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Marjanović D., Laurin M., Assessing confidence intervals for stratigraphic ranges of higher taxa: The case of Lissamphibia. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 53, 413–432 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sanderson M. J., Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: A penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 101–109 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Paradis E., Molecular dating of phylogenies by likelihood methods: A comparison of models and a new information criterion. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 67, 436–444 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang Z., Rannala B., Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 212–226 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Drummond A. J., Ho S. Y. W., Phillips M. J., Rambaut A., Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLOS Biol. 4, e88 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ho S. Y. W., Duchêne S., Molecular-clock methods for estimating evolutionary rates and timescales. Mol. Ecol. 23, 5947–5965 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Strauss D., Sadler P. M., Classical confidence intervals and Bayesian probability estimates for ends of local taxon ranges. Math. Geol. 21, 411–427 (1989). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Solow A. R., Estimation of stratigraphic ranges when fossil finds are not randomly distributed. Paleobiology 29, 181–185 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang S. C., Everson P. J., Confidence intervals for pulsed mass extinction events. Paleobiology 33, 324–336 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bouckaert R., Heled J., Kühnert D., Vaughan T., Wu C.-H., Xie D., Suchard M. A., Rambaut A., Drummond A. J., BEAST 2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLOS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003537 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Woodburne M. O., Goin F. J., Bond M., Carlini A. A., Gelfo J. N., López G. M., Iglesias A., Zimicz Ana N., Paleogene land mammal faunas of South America; a response to global climatic changes and indigenous floral diversity. J. Mammal. Evol. 21, 1–73 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 46.J. E. Francis, A. Ashworth, D. J. Cantrill, J. A. Crame, J. Howe, R. Stephens, A. M. Tosolini, V. Thorn, 100 Million years of Antarctic climate evolution: Evidence from fossil plants, in Antarctica: A Keystone in a Changing World, A. K. Cooper, P. J. Barrett, H. Stagg, B. Storey, E. Stump, W. Wise, Eds. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008), pp. 19–27. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jaramillo C., Ochoa D., Contreras L., Pagani M., Carvajal-Ortiz H., Pratt L. M., Krishnan S., Cardona A., Romero M., Quiroz L., Rodriguez G., Rueda M. J., de la Parra F., Morón S., Green W., Bayona G., Montes C., Quintero O., Ramirez R., Mora G., Schouten S., Bermudez H., Navarrete R., Parra F., Alvarán M., Osorno J., Crowley J. L., Valencia V., Vervoort J., Effects of rapid global warming at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary on neotropical vegetation. Science 330, 957–961 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wing S. L., Herrera F., Jaramillo C. A., Gómez-Navarro C., Wilf P., Labandeira C. C., Late Paleocene fossils from the Cerrejon Formation, Colombia, are the earliest record of Neotropical rainforest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 18627–18632 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Poole I., Cantrill D., Utescher T., A multi-proxy approach to determine Antarctic terrestrial palaeoclimate during the late Cretaceous and early tertiary. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 222, 95–121 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 50.Iglesias A., Artabe A. E., Morel E. M., The evolution of Patagonian climate and vegetation from the Mesozoic to the present. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 103, 409–422 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rich T. H., Vickers-Rich P., Gangloff R. A., Polar dinosaurs. Science 295, 979–980 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.K. Black, M. Archer, S. Hand, H. Godthelp, in Earth and Life, Global Biodiversity, Extinction Intervals and Biogeographic Perturbations Through Time, International Year of Planet Earth, J. A. Talent, Ed. (Springer, Dordrecht, 2012), pp. 983–1078. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Scher H. D., Martin E. E., Timing and climatic consequences of the opening of Drake Passage. Science 312, 428–430 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.J. A. Case, in Antarctica: A Keystone in a Changing World – Online Proceedings of the 10th ISAES X, A. K. Cooper, C. R. Raymond et al., Eds., USGS Open-File Report 2007-1047, Extended Abstract 117 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Livermore R., Hillenbrand C.-D., Meredith M., Eagles G., Drake Passage and Cenozoic climate: An open and shut case? Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 8, Q01005 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Dalziel I. W. D., Lawver L. A., Norton I. O., Gahagan L. M., The Scotia arc: Genesis, evolution, global significance. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 41, 767–793 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Eagles G., Livermore R., Morris P., Small basins in the Scotia Sea: The Eocene Drake Passage gateway. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 242, 343–353 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schellart W. P., Lister G. S., Toy V. G., A Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic reconstruction of the Southwest Pacific region: Tectonics controlled by subduction and slab rollback processes. Earth Sci. Rev. 76, 191–233 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ladiges P. Y., Cantrill D., New Caledonia–Australian connections: Biogeographic patterns and geology. Aust. Syst. Bot. 20, 383–389 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 60.Royer J.-Y., Rollet N., Plate-tectonic setting of the Tasmanian region. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 44, 543–560 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 61.Exon N. F., Hill P. J., Lafoy Y., Heine C., Bernardel G., Kenn Plateau off northeast Australia: A continental fragment in the southwest Pacific jigsaw. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 53, 541–564 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 62.Flynn J. J., Wyss A. R., Recent advances in South American mammalian paleontology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 449–454 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hoernle K., van den Bogaard P., Werner R., Lissinna B., Hauff F., Alvarado G., Garbe-Schönberg D., Missing history (16–71 Ma) of the Galápagos hotspot: Implications for the tectonic and biological evolution of the Americas. Geology 30, 795–798 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 64.Buchs D. M., Arculus R. J., Baumgartner P. O., Baumgartner-Mora C., Ulianov A., Late Cretaceous arc development on the SW margin of the Caribbean Plate: Insights from the Golfito, Costa Rica, and Azuero, Panama, complexes. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 11, Q07S24 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wegner W., Wörner G., Harmon R. S., Jicha B. R., Magmatic history and evolution of the Central American Land Bridge in Panama since Cretaceous times. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 123, 703– 724 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 66.S. L. Wing, Tertiary vegetation of North America as a context for mammalian evolution, in Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America. Vol. 1. Terrestrial Carnivores, Ungulates, and Ungulatelike Mammals, C. M. Janis, K. M. Scott, L. L. Jacobs, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998), pp. 37–60. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Collinson M. E., Hooker J. J., Paleogene vegetation of Eurasia: Framework for mammalian faunas. Deinsea 10, 41–84 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 68.M. O. Woodburne, in Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Mammals of North America, M. O. Woodburne, Ed. (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 2004), pp. 315–343. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Eberle J. J., Greenwood D. R., Life at the top of the greenhouse Eocene world—A review of the Eocene flora and vertebrate fauna from Canada’s High Arctic. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 124, 3–23 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 70.L. Grande, The Lost World of Fossil Lake: Snapshots from Deep Time (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2013). [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lindow B. E. K., Dyke G. J., Bird evolution in the Eocene: Climate change in Europe and a Danish fossil fauna. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 81, 483–499 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ericson P. G. P., Evolution of terrestrial birds in three continents: Biogeography and parallel radiations. J. Biogeogr. 39, 813–824 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 73.Doré A. G., Lundin E. R., Jensen L. N., Birkeland Ø., Eliassen P. E., Fichler C., Principal tectonic events in the evolution of the northwest European Atlantic margin. Geol. Soc. Lond. Pet. Geol. Conf. Ser. 5, 41–61 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 74.Oakey G. N., Chalmers J. A., A new model for the Paleogene motion of Greenland relative to North America: Plate reconstructions of the Davis Strait and Nares Strait regions between Canada and Greenland. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 117, B10401 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 75.Blois J. L., Hadly E. A., Mammalian response to Cenozoic climatic change. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 37, 181–208 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 76.Anell I., Thybo H., Artemieva I. M., Cenozoic uplift and subsidence in the North Atlantic region: Geological evidence revisited. Tectonophysics 474, 78–105 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 77.Woodburne M. O., Swisher C. C. III, Land mammal high-resolution geochronology, intercontinental overland dispersals, sea level, climate and vicariance. Soc. Sediment. Geol. Spec. Publ. 54, 335–364 (1995). [Google Scholar]
- 78.Beard K. C., East of Eden: Asia as an important center of taxonomic origination in mammalian evolution. Bull. Carnegie Museum Nat. Hist. 34, 5–39 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- 79.Moyle R. G., Chesser R. T., Prum R. O., Schikler P., Cracraft J., Phylogeny and evolutionary history of Old World suboscine birds (Aves: Eurylaimides). Am. Museum Novit. 3544, 1–22 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 80.Irestedt M., Ohlson J. I., Zuccon D., Källersjö M., Ericson P. G. P., Nuclear DNA from old collections of avian study skins reveals the evolutionary history of the Old World suboscines (Aves, Passeriformes). Zool. Scr. 35, 567–580 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ericson P. G. P., Irestedt M., Johansson U. S., Evolution, biogeography, and patterns of diversification in passerine birds. J. Avian Biol. 34, 3–15 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ericson P. G. P., Klopfstein S., Irestedt M., Nguyen J. M. T., Nylander J. A. S., Dating the diversification of the major lineages of Passeriformes (Aves). BMC Evol. Biol. 14, 8 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Jønsson K. A., Fabre P.-H., Ricklefs R. E., Fjeldså J., Major global radiation of corvoid birds originated in the proto-Papuan archipelago. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 2328–2333 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hall R., Cenozoic geological and plate tectonic evolution of SE Asia and the SW Pacific: Computer-based reconstructions, model and animations. J. Asian Earth Sci. 20, 353–431 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 85.Hall R., Late Jurassic–Cenozoic reconstructions of the Indonesian region and the Indian Ocean. Tectonophys 570–571, 1–41 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 86.Jønsson K. A., Fjeldså J., Determining biogeographical patterns of dispersal and diversification in oscine passerine birds in Australia, Southeast Asia and Africa. J. Biogeogr. 33, 1155–1165 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 87.Condamine F. L., Rolland J., Morlon H., Macroevolutionary perspectives to environmental change. Ecol. Lett. 16, 72–85 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Friedrich O., Norris R. D., Erbacher J., Evolution of middle to Late Cretaceous oceans—A 55 m.y. record of Earth’s temperature and carbon cycle. Geology 40, 107–110 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zachos J., Pagani M., Sloan L., Thomas E., Billups K., Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292, 686–693 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Vrba E. S., Turnover pulse, the Red Queen, and related topics. Am. J. Sci. 293, 418–452 (1993). [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wilf P., Cúneo N. R., Escapa I. H., Pol D., Woodburne M. O., Splendid and seldom isolated: The paleobiogeography of Patagonia. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 41, 561–603 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 92.Le Roux J. P., A review of Tertiary climate changes in southern South America and the Antarctic Peninsula. Part 2: Continental conditions. Sediment. Geol. 247–248, 21–38 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 93.Fortelius M., Eronen J., Jernvall J., Liu L., Pushkina D., Rinne J., Tesakov A., Vislobokova I., Zhang Z., Zhou L., Fossil mammals resolve regional patterns of Eurasian climate change over 20 million years. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 1005–1016 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 94.Zhang Z., Ramstein G., Schuster M., Li C., Contoux C., Yan Q., Aridification of the Sahara desert caused by Tethys Sea shrinkage during the Late Miocene. Nature 513, 401–404 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Martin H. A., Cenozoic climatic change and the development of the arid vegetation in Australia. J. Arid Environ. 66, 533–563 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 96.Brocklehurst N., Upchurch P., Mannion P. D., O’Connor J., The completeness of the fossil record of Mesozoic birds: Implications for early avian evolution. PLOS One 7, e39056 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Barreda V. D., Cúneo N. R., Wilf P., Currano E. D., Scasso R. A., Brinkhuis H., Cretaceous/Paleogene floral turnover in Patagonia: Drop in diversity, low extinction, and a Classopollis spike. PLOS One 7, e52455 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Bowman V. C., Francis J. E., Askin R. A., Riding J. B., Swindles G. T., Latest Cretaceous–earliest Paleogene vegetation and climate change at the high southern latitudes: Palynological evidence from Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 408, 26–47 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 99.Crisp M. D., Cook L. G., Explosive radiation or cryptic mass extinction? Interpreting signatures in molecular phylogenies. Evolution 63, 2257–2265 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Stadler T., Simulating trees with a fixed number of extant species. Syst. Biol. 60, 676–684 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Prothero D. R., Did impacts, volcanic eruptions, or climate change affect mammalian evolution? Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 214, 283–294 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 102.J. Alroy, in Speciation and Patterns of Diversity, R. Butlin, J. R. Bridle, D. Schluter, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009), pp. 301–323. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Benton M. J., The origins of modern biodiversity on land. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365, 3667–3679 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Sepkoski J. J., Rates of speciation in the fossil record. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353, 315–326 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Haffer J., Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165, 131–137 (1969). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Avise J. C., Walker D. E., Pleistocene phylogeographic effects on avian populations and the speciation process. Proc. Biol. Sci. 265, 457–463 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Hewitt G. M., Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359, 183–195 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Weir J. T., Schluter D., Ice sheets promote speciation in boreal birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 271, 1881–1887 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Fjeldsâ J., Bowie R. C. K., Rahbek C., The role of mountain ranges in the diversification of birds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 43, 249–265 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 110.Lim H. C., Rahman M. A., Lim S. L. H., Moyle R. G., Sheldon F. H., Revisiting Wallace’s haunt: Coalescent simulations and comparative niche modeling reveal historical mechanisms that promoted avian population divergence in the Malay Archipelago. Evolution 65, 321–334 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wiens J. J., Speciation and ecology revisited: Phylogenetic niche conservatism and the origin of species. Evolution 58, 193–197 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Weir J. T., Schluter D., The latitudinal gradient in recent speciation and extinction rates of birds and mammals. Science 315, 1574–1576 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Botero C. A., Dor R., McCain C. M., Safran R. J., Environmental harshness is positively correlated with intraspecific divergence in mammals and birds. Mol. Ecol. 23, 259–268 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lanfear R., Calcott B., Ho S. Y. W., Guindon S., PartitionFinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1695–1701 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Heled J., Drummond A. J., Calibrated tree priors for relaxed phylogenetics and divergence time estimation. Syst. Biol. 61, 138–149 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Ronquist F., Sanmartín I., Phylogenetic methods in biogeography. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 441–464 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 117.Pirie M. D., Humphreys A. M., Antonelli A., Galley C., Linder H. P., Model uncertainty in ancestral area reconstruction: A parsimonious solution? Taxon 61, 652–664 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 118.Matzke N. J., Probabilistic historical biogeography: New models for founder-event speciation, imperfect detection, and fossils allow improved accuracy and model-testing. Front. Biogeogr. 5, 242–248 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 119.Schliep K. P., phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Stadler T., Mammalian phylogeny reveals recent diversification rate shifts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 6187–6192 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Lambert A., Stadler T., Birth–death models and coalescent point processes: The shape and probability of reconstructed phylogenies. Theor. Popul. Biol. 90, 113–128 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.E. C. Dickinson, J. V. Remsen Jr., The Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1. Non-Passerines (Aves Press, Eastburn, UK, ed. 4, 2013). [Google Scholar]
- 123.E. C. Dickinson, L. Christidis, The Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World. Vol. 2. Passerines (Aves Press, Eastburn, UK, ed. 4, 2014). [Google Scholar]
- 124.Cramer B. S., Toggweiler J. R., Wright J. D., Katz M. E., Miller K. G., Ocean overturning since the Late Cretaceous: Inferences from a new benthic foraminiferal isotope compilation. Paleoceanography 24, PA4216 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 125.Hansen J., Sato M., Russell G., Kharecha P., Climate sensitivity, sea level and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 371, 20120294 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.S. L. Olson, in Avian Biology, vol. 8, D. S. Farner, J. R. King, K. C. Parkes, Eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1985), pp. 79–252. [Google Scholar]
- 127.Cuello J. P., Lista de las aves fósiles de la región neotropical y de las islas antillanas. Paula-Coutiana 2, 3–79 (1988). [Google Scholar]
- 128.J. Mlíkovský, Cenozoic Birds of the World. Part 1: Europe (Ninox Press, Prague, 2002), 406 pp. [Google Scholar]
- 129.C. P. Tambussi, F. Degrange, South American and Antarctic Continental Cenozoic Birds: Paleobiogeographic Affinities and Disparities (Springer, Dordrecht, 2013), 124 pp. [Google Scholar]
- 130.Alvarenga H. M. F., Uma ave ratitae do Paleoceno brasileiro: Bacia calcária de Itaboraí, estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Bol. Mus. Nac. Geol. 41, 1–8 (1983). [Google Scholar]
- 131.Harshman J., Braun E. L., Braun M. J., Huddleston C. J., Bowie R. C. K., Chojnowski J. L., Hackett S. J., Han K.-L., Kimball R. T., Marks B. D., Miglia K. J., Moore W. S., Reddy S., Sheldon F. H., Steadman D. W., Steppan S. J., Witt C. C., Yuri T., Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 13462–13467 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Smith J. V., Braun E. L., Kimball R. T., Ratite nonmonophyly: Independent evidence from 40 novel loci. Syst. Biol. 62, 35–49 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Mitchell K. J., Llamas B., Soubrier J., Rawlence N. J., Worthy T. H., Wood J., Lee M. S. Y., Cooper A., Ancient DNA reveals elephant birds and kiwi are sister taxa and clarifies ratite bird evolution. Science 344, 898–900 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Worthy T. H., Hand S. J., Archer M., Phylogenetic relationships of the Australian Oligo-Miocene ratite Emuarius gidju Casuariidae. Integr. Zool. 9, 148–166 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Mayr G., The age of the crown group of passerine birds and its evolutionary significance—Molecular calibrations versus the fossil record. Syst. Biodivers. 11, 7–13 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 136.P. Brodkorb, in Papers in Avian Paleontology Honoring Hildegarde Howard, K. E. Campbell, Ed. (National History Museum of Los Angeles County Contributions in Science, Los Angeles, CA, 1980), pp. 17–31. [Google Scholar]
- 137.Rasmussen D. T., Olson S. L., Simons E. L., Fossil birds from the Oligocene Jebel Qatrani formation Fayum Province, Egypt. Sm. C. Paleob. 62, 1–20 (1987). [Google Scholar]
- 138.Seiffert E. R., Revised age estimates for the later Paleogene mammal faunas of Egypt and Oman. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 5000–5005 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Louchart A., Tourment N., Carrier J., The earliest known pelican reveals 30 million years of evolutionary stasis in beak morphology. J. Ornithol. 152, 15–20 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 140.Mayr G., An osprey (Aves: Accipitridae: Pandioninae) from the early Oligocene of Germany. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 86, 93–96 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 141.Mayr G., Manegold A., New specimens of the earliest European passeriform bird. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 51, 315–323 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 142.Manegold A., Passerine diversity in the late Oligocene of Germany: Earliest evidence for the sympatric coexistence of Suboscines and Oscines. Ibis 150, 377–387 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 143.Manegold A., Mayr G., Mourer-Chauviré C., Miocene songbirds and the composition of the European passeriform avifauna. Auk 121, 1155–1160 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 144.Claramunt S., Rinderknecht A., A new fossil furnariid from the Pleistocene of Uruguay, with remarks on nasal type, cranial kinetics, and relationships of the extinct genus Pseudoseisuropsis. Condor 107, 114–127 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 145.Mayr G., Manegold A., A small suboscine-like passeriform bird from the early Oligocene of France. Condor 108, 717–720 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 146.Boles W. E., The world’s oldest songbird. Nature 374, 21–22 (1995). [Google Scholar]
- 147.Bochenski Z. M., Tomek T., Wertz K., Swidnicka E., The third nearly complete passerine bird from the early Oligocene of Europe. J. Ornithol. 154, 923–931 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 148.Bochenski Z. M., Tomek T., Swidnicka E., A complete passerine foot from the late Oligocene of Poland. Palaeontol. Electron. 17, 1–7 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 149.Manegold A., Earliest fossil record of the Certhioidea (treecreepers and allies) from the early Miocene of Germany. J. Ornithol. 149, 223–228 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 150.Alström P., Ericson P. G. P., Olsson U., Sundberg P., Phylogeny and classification of the avian superfamily Sylvioidea. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 38, 381–397 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Johansson U. S., Fjeldså J., Bowie R. C. K., Phylogenetic relationships within Passerida (Aves: Passeriformes): A review and a new molecular phylogeny based on three nuclear intron markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48, 858–876 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Barker F. K., Barrowclough G. F., Groth J. G., A phylogenetic hypothesis for passerine birds: Taxonomic and biogeographic implications of an analysis of nuclear DNA sequence data. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269, 295–308 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Steadman D. W., A re-examination of Palaeostruthus hatcheri (Schufeldt), a late Miocene sparrow from Kansas. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 1, 171–173 (1981). [Google Scholar]
- 154.Klicka J., Keith Barker F., Burns K. J., Lanyon S. M., Lovette I. J., Chaves J. A., Bryson R. W. Jr, A comprehensive multilocus assessment of sparrow (Aves: Passerellidae) relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 77, 177–182 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Keith Barker F., Burns K. J., Klicka J., Lanyon S. M., Lovette I. J., Going to extremes: Contrasting rates of diversification in a recent radiation of new world passerine birds. Syst. Biol. 62, 298–320 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Stamatakis A., Ludwig T., Meier H., RAxML-III: A fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 21, 456–463 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Posada D., Crandall K. A., Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Syst. Biol. 50, 580–601 (2001). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Stadler T., On incomplete sampling under birth-death models and connections to the sampling-based coalescent. J. Theor. Biol. 261, 58–66 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Stadler T., Kühnert D., Bonhoeffer S., Drummond A. J., Birth-death skyline plot reveals temporal changes of epidemic spread in HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 228–233 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Holt B. G., Lessard J.-P., Borregaard M. K., Fritz S. A., Araújo M. B., Dimitrov D., Fabre P.-H., Graham C. H., Graves G. R., Jønsson K. A., Nogués-Bravo D., Wang Z., Whittaker R. J., Fjeldså J., Rahbek C., An update of Wallace’s zoogeographic regions of the world. Science 339, 74–78 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Ronquist F., Dispersal-vicariance analysis: A new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Syst. Biol. 46, 195–203 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 162.Maddison W. P., Maddison D. R., Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Evolution 62, 1103–1118 (2008).18298648 [Google Scholar]
- 163.Britton T., Oxelman B., Vinnersten A., Bremer K., Phylogenetic dating with confidence intervals using mean path lengths. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24, 58–65 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Paradis E., Claude J., Strimmer K., APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Haddrath O., Baker A. J., Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences of extinct birds: Ratite phylogenetics and the vicariance biogeography hypothesis. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268, 939–945 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Cracraft J., Phylogenetic relationships and transantarctic biogeography of some gruiform birds. Geobios 15, 393–402 (1982). [Google Scholar]
- 167.Livezey B. C., Zusi R. L., Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 149, 1–95 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Worthy T. H., Tennyson A. J. D., Scofield R. P., Fossils reveal an early Miocene presence of the aberrant gruiform Aves: Aptornithidae in New Zealand. J. Ornithol. 152, 669–680 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 169.McGuire J. A., Witt C. C., Remsen J. V. Jr, Corl A., Rabosky D. L., Altshuler D. L., Dudley R., Molecular phylogenetics and the diversification of hummingbirds. Curr. Biol. 24, 910–916 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Mayr G., New specimens of the early Oligocene Old World hummingbird Eurotrochilus inexpectatus. J. Ornithol. 148, 105–111 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 171.Karhu A. A., A new genus and species of the family Jungornithidae (Apodiformes) from the late Eocene of the Northern Caucasus, with comments on the ancestry of hummingbirds. Sm. C. Paleob. 89, 207–216 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 172.Mayr G., Old World fossil record of modern-type hummingbirds. Science 304, 861–864 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Miller A. H., A fossil hoatzin from the Miocene of Colombia. Auk 70, 484–489 (1953). [Google Scholar]
- 174.Mayr G., Alvarenga H., Mourer-Chauviré C., Out of Africa: Fossils shed light on the origin of the hoatzin, an iconic Neotropic bird. Naturwissenschaften 98, 961–966 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Mayr G., A hoatzin fossil from the middle Miocene of Kenya documents the past occurrence of modern-type Opisthocomiformes in Africa. Auk 131, 55–60 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 176.Mayr G., De Pietri V. L., Earliest and first Northern Hemispheric hoatzin fossils substantiate Old World origin of a “Neotropic endemic”. Naturwissenschaften 101, 143–148 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Wright T. F., Schirtzinger E. E., Matsumoto T., Eberhard J. R., Graves G. R., Sanchez J. J., Capelli S., Müller H., Scharpegge J., Chambers G. K., Fleischer R. C., A multilocus molecular phylogeny of the parrots (Psittaciformes): Support for a Gondwanan origin during the Cretaceous. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 2141–2156 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Schweizer M., Seehausen O., Güntert M., Hertwig S. T., The evolutionary diversification of parrots supports a taxon pulse model with multiple trans-oceanic dispersal events and local radiations. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 54, 984–994 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Schweizer M., Seehausen O., Hertwig S. T., Macroevolutionary patterns in the diversification of parrots: Effects of climate change, geological events and key innovations. J. Biogeogr. 38, 2176–2194 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 180.Waterhouse D. M., Parrots in a nutshell: The fossil record of Psittaciformes (Aves). Hist. Biol. 18, 227–238 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 181.Manegold A., The early fossil record of perching birds (Passeriformes). Palaeont. Afr. 44, 103–107 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 182.K. P. Burnham, D. R. Anderson, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, New York, 2002), 488 pp. [Google Scholar]
- 183.Bailer-Jones C. A. L., Bayesian time series analysis of terrestrial impact cratering. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 1163–1180 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 184.Courtillot V. E., Renne P. R., On the ages of flood basalt events. C. R. Geosci. 335, 113–140 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 185.O. Eldhom, M. F. Coffin, in The History and Dynamics of Global Plate Motions (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 2000), pp. 309–326. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1/11/e1501005/DC1
Text
Fig. S1. Probability density distributions for the age of the most recent common ancestor (crown age) of 24 avian clades in the RAG data set inferred from the distribution of fossil occurrences.
Fig. S2. Biogeographic ancestral area reconstruction using Fitch parsimony optimization.
Fig. S3. Alternative biogeographic ancestral area reconstructions.
Fig. S4. Diversification through time of modern birds and Earth history events.
Fig. S5. Effect of the tree prior on Bayesian divergence time estimation.
Table S1. Probability distributions of clade age from fossil occurrences, used as calibration priors in Bayesian divergence time analysis in BEAST 2.
Table S2. Reconstructions of the taxonomic composition of Late Cretaceous–Cenozoic global avifaunas.
Table S3. Environmental birth-death models of the associations between diversification rates and global temperature in modern birds.
Table S4. Birth-death shift models representing associations between Earth history events and diversification rates in modern birds.
Data set 1. Fossils used for calibration.
Data set 2. Biogeographic and richness information.