Female genital cosmetic and plastic surgery: a review
- PMID: 21492397
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02254.x
Female genital cosmetic and plastic surgery: a review
Abstract
Introduction: This review studies rationale and outcome of vulvovaginal aesthetic surgery.
Aim: Discuss procedures designed to alter genital appearance and function; investigate sexual, philosophical, and ethical issues; examine outcomes.
Methods: (i) Medline search of the existing literature utilizing terms labiaplasty, clitoral hood reduction, hymenoplasty (HP), vaginoplasty (VP), perineoplasty (PP), female genital surgery, sexual satisfaction/body image, and anterior/posterior colporrhaphy; (ii) references from bibliographies of papers found through the literature search and in the author's reading of available literature.
Main outcome measures: (i) Demographics and psychosexual dynamics of women requesting female genital plastic/cosmetic surgery; (ii) overall and sexual satisfaction of subjects undergoing these procedures.
Results: The majority of studies regarding patient satisfaction and sexual function after vaginal aesthetic and functional plastic procedures report beneficial results, with overall patient satisfaction in the 90-95% range, sexual satisfaction over 80-85%. These data are supported by outcome data from nonelective vaginal support procedures. Complications appear minor and acceptable to patients. There are little data available regarding outcomes and satisfaction of HP, or function during the rigors of subsequent vaginal childbirth, although the literature contains no case reports of labiaplasty disruption during parturition.
Conclusion: Women requesting labiaplasty and reduction of their clitoral hoods do so for both cosmetic and functional (chafing, interference with coitus, interference with athletic activities, etc.) reasons, while patients requesting VP and/or PP do so in order to increase friction and sexual satisfaction, occasionally for aesthetic reasons. Patients appear generally happy with outcomes. The majority of patients undergoing genital plastic surgery report overall satisfaction and subjective enhancement of sexual function and body image, but the literature is retrospective. Female genital plastic surgery procedures appear to fulfill the majority of patient's desires for cosmetic and functional improvement, as well as enhancement of the sexual experience. Little information is available regarding HP outcomes.
© 2011 International Society for Sexual Medicine.
Similar articles
-
A large multicenter outcome study of female genital plastic surgery.J Sex Med. 2010 Apr;7(4 Pt 1):1565-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01573.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12. J Sex Med. 2010. PMID: 19912495
-
[Cosmetic surgery of the female genitalia].Prog Urol. 2013 Jul;23(9):601-11. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.01.017. Epub 2013 May 9. Prog Urol. 2013. PMID: 23830254 Review. French.
-
Evaluation of Body Image and Sexual Satisfaction in Women Undergoing Female Genital Plastic/Cosmetic Surgery.Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Oct;36(9):1048-57. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw061. Epub 2016 Apr 15. Aesthet Surg J. 2016. PMID: 27084062
-
Using Google Trends for Evaluation of Public Interest in Female Genital Aesthetic Procedures.Dermatol Surg. 2023 Aug 1;49(8):762-765. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003832. Epub 2023 May 9. Dermatol Surg. 2023. PMID: 37523594
-
A Review of Aesthetic Gynecologic Procedures for Women.Plast Aesthet Nurs (Phila). 2022 Oct-Dec 01;42(4):226-237. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000479. Plast Aesthet Nurs (Phila). 2022. PMID: 36469394 Review.
Cited by
-
"I Don't See That as a Medical Problem": Clinicians' Attitudes and Responses to Requests for Cosmetic Genital Surgery by Adolescents.J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Dec;15(4):535-548. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9878-1. Epub 2018 Oct 19. J Bioeth Inq. 2018. PMID: 30341676
-
Vaginal sling implant misdiagnosed as rectal subepithelial tumor.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jul;61(4):533-536. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.533. Epub 2018 Jun 29. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018. PMID: 30018910 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Thai version of the Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS).BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01841-8. BMC Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 35752788 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosexual outcome after labiaplasty: a prospective case-comparison study.Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jun;25(6):831-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2297-2. Epub 2014 Jan 22. Int Urogynecol J. 2014. PMID: 24448726
-
Labiaplasty: motivation, techniques, and ethics.Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Mar;15(3):175-189. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2018.1. Epub 2018 Feb 6. Nat Rev Urol. 2018. PMID: 29405204 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous