Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 21;8(8):e71883.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071883. eCollection 2013.

Horizontal movements, migration patterns, and population structure of whale sharks in the Gulf of Mexico and northwestern Caribbean sea

Affiliations

Horizontal movements, migration patterns, and population structure of whale sharks in the Gulf of Mexico and northwestern Caribbean sea

Robert E Hueter et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

  • PLoS One. 2013;8(11). doi:10.1371/annotation/491b9b6c-7f77-4fb0-b336-572078aec830

Abstract

Whale sharks, Rhincodon typus, aggregate by the hundreds in a summer feeding area off the northeastern Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, where the Gulf of Mexico meets the Caribbean Sea. The aggregation remains in the nutrient-rich waters off Isla Holbox, Isla Contoy and Isla Mujeres, Quintana Roo for several months in the summer and then dissipates between August and October. Little has been known about where these sharks come from or migrate to after they disperse. From 2003-2012, we used conventional visual tags, photo-identification, and satellite tags to characterize the basic population structure and large-scale horizontal movements of whale sharks that come to this feeding area off Mexico. The aggregation comprised sharks ranging 2.5-10.0 m in total length and included juveniles, subadults, and adults of both sexes, with a male-biased sex ratio (72%). Individual sharks remained in the area for an estimated mean duration of 24-33 days with maximum residency up to about 6 months as determined by photo-identification. After leaving the feeding area the sharks showed horizontal movements in multiple directions throughout the Gulf of Mexico basin, the northwestern Caribbean Sea, and the Straits of Florida. Returns of individual sharks to the Quintana Roo feeding area in subsequent years were common, with some animals returning for six consecutive years. One female shark with an estimated total length of 7.5 m moved at least 7,213 km in 150 days, traveling through the northern Caribbean Sea and across the equator to the South Atlantic Ocean where her satellite tag popped up near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. We hypothesize this journey to the open waters of the Mid-Atlantic was for reproductive purposes but alternative explanations are considered. The broad movements of whale sharks across multiple political boundaries corroborates genetics data supporting gene flow between geographically distinct areas and underscores the need for management and conservation strategies for this species on a global scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Whale shark study area off the northeastern Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.
The locations of PSAT tagging are indicated by open circles (n = 35).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Length-frequency histogram of conventionally tagged whale sharks of known length in the Yucatan study area 2003–2011 (n = 728).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Most probable tracks of whale sharks moving into the Gulf of Mexico.
(A) Sharks 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 30. (B) Sharks 16, 22, 25, 26, and 27. The location of the Flower Garden Banks in the northwestern Gulf are indicated by a black asterisk in 3A.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Most probable tracks of whale sharks moving into the vicinity of the Straits of Florida and Caribbean Sea.
(A) Sharks 13, 14, 20, 24, and 28. (B) Sharks 5, 17, 21, 23 and 35.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Most probable track of Shark 15 (“Rio Lady”) derived from the unscented Kalman filter (red line).
The locations of the Saint Peter and Saint Paul Archipelago (black asterisk) and very small whale sharks (black plus signs) as reported by Kukuyev (1996) are indicated near the tag’s pop-up location (lat/long for newborn shark data points from Martin (2007) [90]).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Habitat utilization distributions for satellite-tagged whale sharks based on their most probable tracks.
(A) All sharks combined; (B) Females; (C) Males; (D) Smaller females (<8 mTL); (E) Larger females (≥8 m TL). The 1,000 m bathymetric contour approximates the shelf edge.
Figure 7
Figure 7. A comparison of the tracks from the double-tagging of Shark 27.
The SPOT track (blue line) includes location qualities of 3, 2, 1, 0, and A. The highest quality SPOT locations (LC≥1) have a black dot inside their white circular symbol. The light-derived PSAT results as raw geolocations (broken line of inset figure), the uncorrected MPT (red line), and the bathymetrically corrected MPT (green line) are shown for the same time period as that of the SPOT tag.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Compagno LJV (2001) Sharks of the world: an annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Volume 2: bullhead, mackerel, and carpet sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes), FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 1, Rome. 269 pp.
    1. Stewart BS, Wilson SG (2005) Threatened fishes of the world: Rhincodon typus (Smith 1828) (Rhinodontidae). Environ Biol Fish 74: 184–185.
    1. Norman B (2005) Rhincodon typus In: IUCN 2010. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2010.1. Available: http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 2010 March 17.
    1. Eckert SA, Stewart BS (2001) Telemetry and satellite tracking of whale sharks, Rhincodon typus, in the Sea of Cortez, Mexico, and the north Pacific Ocean. Environ Biol Fish 60: 299–308.
    1. Eckert SA, Dolar LL, Kooyman GL, Perrin W, Rahman RA (2002) Movements of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) in South-east Asian waters as determined by satellite telemetry. J Zool. 257: 111–115.

Publication types

Grants and funding

This research was supported by funding from Georgia Aquarium (www.georgiaaquarium.org), Christopher Reynolds Foundation (www.creynolds.org), National Geographic Society (www.ngs.org), Mote Marine Laboratory (www.mote.org) and an anonymous private foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources