Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jun 26;5(3):1245-65.
doi: 10.3390/biom5031245.

Bacterial Sigma Factors and Anti-Sigma Factors: Structure, Function and Distribution

Mark S Paget  1
Affiliations
Review

Bacterial Sigma Factors and Anti-Sigma Factors: Structure, Function and Distribution

Mark S Paget. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

Sigma factors are multi-domain subunits of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) that play critical roles in transcription initiation, including the recognition and opening of promoters as well as the initial steps in RNA synthesis. This review focuses on the structure and function of the major sigma-70 class that includes the housekeeping sigma factor (Group 1) that directs the bulk of transcription during active growth, and structurally-related alternative sigma factors (Groups 2-4) that control a wide variety of adaptive responses such as morphological development and the management of stress. A recurring theme in sigma factor control is their sequestration by anti-sigma factors that occlude their RNAP-binding determinants. Sigma factors are then released through a wide variety of mechanisms, often involving branched signal transduction pathways that allow the integration of distinct signals. Three major strategies for sigma release are discussed: regulated proteolysis, partner-switching, and direct sensing by the anti-sigma factor.

Keywords: RIP; RNA polymerase; anti-sigma; extracytoplasmic; partner-switching; sigma; signal transduction; stress; transcription.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Domain organization, promoter recognition and structural organization of the σ70 family. (a) The domain organization of σ factors from Groups 1, 3 and 4 are illustrated above σ70 (Group 1) consensus E. coli promoter DNA. Structural domains are colored: σ1.1, white; σ2, green/orange; σ3, blue; σ4, red. Within each domain, conserved σ regions are indicated for Group 1 σs. Non-template (NT) strand DNA is colored magenta and template (T) strand cyan, with key consensus promoter elements contacted by σ indicated in yellow: “−35”, −35 element; “ext −10”, extended −10 element; “−10”, −10 element; “disc”, discriminator. Transcription initiates at +1. Note that σ2 is colored green and orange to distinguish σ regions 2.1–2.4 and 1.2. The nonconserved region (NCR; pink) located between 1.2 and 2.1 (pink) is variable in size and structure among Group 1 σ factors. (b) Organization of E. coli σ70 in an RNA polymerase transcription initiation complex. The model was based on the crystal structure of an E. coli transcription initiation complex (PDB: 4YLN) [22]. σ70 domains (surface representation) and promoter DNA (spheres) are colored as in (a), as indicated in the panel. For clarity the β, 2α and ω subunits of RNA polymerase are omitted. The model indicates the location of the σ finger and its close proximity to nascent RNA (4 nt, yellow) and template strand DNA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interactions of E. coli σ70 and σE with “flipped out” bases in non-template strand of −10 regions. The σ70-DNA model is a partial representation of a crystal structure of an E. coli σ70 transcription initiation complex (PDB: 4YLN) [22] showing the σ702 domain interactions with the non-template strand (C-13T-12A-11T-10A-9A-8T-7G-6T-5G-4) Flipped out bases in the −10 element (−11A and −7T) and the discriminator element (−6G) are indicated. Note that DNA upstream of −11A is double stranded, with the template strand not shown for clarity. The σE-DNA model is based on a crystal structure of the E. coli σE2 domain bound to a non-template strand oligonucleotide (PDB: 4LUP) [23] based on the σE consensus −10 sequence (T-13G-12T-11C-10A-9A-8A-7). The modular loop that interacts with the flipped out −10C is indicated. σ2 domains are illustrated in surface representation with conserved regions colored as indicated and the σ70 NCR not shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The inhibition of σ activity by anti-σ factors. A comparison between complexes of σE-RseA (PDB: 1OR7-2) and a σCnrH/CnrY/ (PDB: 4CXF). The σ2 and σ4 domains are colored green and red, respectively. The anti-sigma binding domains of RseA and CnrY are colored blue.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mechanisms for σ factor release from anti-σ factors. (a) Activation of σE in E. coli. The membrane-spanning anti-σ RseA binds σE through its cytoplasmic ASD. The C-termini of OMPs that accumulate in the periplasm activate DegS protease through binding to its PDZ domain, resulting in site-1 cleavage of RseA. DegS–dependent cleavage of RseA is inhibited by RseB, and this can be relieved by the accumulation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the periplasm that binds directly to RseB. Site-1 cleavage is sensed by RseP, which subsequently catalyzes site-2 cleavage of RseA on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, releasing a soluble σE/RseA complex. σE is released when the RseA ASD is finally degraded by ATP-dependent proteases such as ClpXP. (b) Activation of σR in S. coelicolor. RsrA binds to and inactivates σR via its ZASD domain. The RsrA zinc ion is coordinated by three cysteine (C) residues and one histidine (H). In response to oxidative stress, RsrA forms at least one disulphide bond, which concomitantly displaces the zinc and causes a structural change that prevents σR binding. The system can be reset by the reduction of RsrA by cellular thiol-disulphide oxidoreductases such as thioredoxin that are activated by σR. (c) Activation of σB in B. subtilis. RsbW is an anti-σ factor/kinase that binds to σB, and additionally inactivates its alternative binding partner RsbV by phosphorylating it to RsbV-P. Activation of σB occurs by partner-switching when RsbV-P is dephosphorylated by alternative phosphatases (RsbTU or RsbQP) in response to environmental or energy stresses, which allows RsbV to bind and sequester RsbW.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Saecker R.M., Record M.T., Dehaseth P.L. Mechanism of bacterial transcription initiation: RNA polymerase—Promoter binding, isomerization to initiation-competent open complexes, and initiation of RNA synthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 2011;412:754–771. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang N., Buck M.A. Perspective on the enhancer dependent bacterial RNA polymerase. Biomolecules. 2015;5:1012–1019. doi: 10.3390/biom5021012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perdue S.A., Roberts J.W. σ70-Dependent transcription pausing in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 2011;412:782–792. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raffaelle M., Kanin E.I., Vogt J., Burgess R.R., Ansari A.Z. Holoenzyme switching and stochastic release of sigma factors from RNA polymerase in vivo. Mol. Cell. 2005;20:357–366. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burgess R.R., Travers A.A., Dunn J.J., Bautz E.K. Factor stimulating transcription by RNA polymerase. Nature. 1969;221:43–46. doi: 10.1038/221043a0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources