Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 1;153(11):1114-1121.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.2815.

Prevalence of Pubic Hair Grooming-Related Injuries and Identification of High-Risk Individuals in the United States

Affiliations

Prevalence of Pubic Hair Grooming-Related Injuries and Identification of High-Risk Individuals in the United States

Matthew D Truesdale et al. JAMA Dermatol. .

Erratum in

  • Descriptive Error in the Text.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Nov 1;153(11):1201. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.4187. JAMA Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28973069 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Pubic hair grooming is a common practice that can lead to injury and morbidity.

Objective: To identify demographic and behavioral risk factors associated with pubic hair grooming-related injuries to characterize individuals with high risk of injury and develop recommendations for safe grooming practices.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study conducted a national survey of noninstitutionalized US adults (aged 18-65 years). The web-based survey was conducted through a probability-based web panel designed to be representative of the US population. Data were collected in January 2014 and analyzed from August 1, 2016, through February 1, 2017.

Main outcomes and measures: Grooming-related injury history (yes or no), high-frequency injuries (>5 lifetime injuries), and injury requiring medical attention.

Results: Among the 7570 participants who completed the survey (4198 men [55.5%] and 3372 women [44.5%]; mean (SD) age, 41.9 [18.9] years), 5674 of 7456 (76.1%) reported a history of grooming (66.5% of men and 85.3% of women [weighted percentages]). Grooming-related injury was reported by 1430 groomers (weighted prevalence, 25.6%), with more women sustaining an injury than men (868 [27.1%] vs 562 [23.7%]; P = .01). Laceration was the most common injury sustained (818 [61.2%]), followed by burn (307 [23.0%]) and rashes (163 [12.2%]). Common areas for grooming-related injury for men were the scrotum (378 [67.2%]), penis (196 [34.8%]), and pubis (162 [28.9%]); for women, the pubis (445 [51.3%]), inner thigh (340 [44.9%]), vagina (369 [42.5%]), and perineum (115 [13.2%]). After adjustment for age, duration of grooming, hairiness, instrument used, and grooming frequency, men who removed all their pubic hair 11 times or more during their lifespan had an increased risk for grooming injury (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.28-3.01; P = .002) and were prone to repeated high-frequency injuries (AOR, 3.89; 95% CI, 2.01-7.52; P < .001) compared with groomers who did not remove all their pubic hair. Women who removed all their pubic hair 11 times or more had increased odds of injury (AOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.53-3.19; P < .001) and high-frequency injuries (AOR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.78-5.01; P < .001) compared with groomers who do not remove all their pubic hair. In women, waxing decreased the odds of high-frequency injuries (AOR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.43; P = .001) compared with nonelectric blades. In total, 79 injuries among 5674 groomers (1.4%) required medical attention.

Conclusions and relevance: Grooming frequency and degree of grooming (ie, removing all pubic hair) are independent risk factors for injury. The present data may help identify injury-prone groomers and lead to safer grooming practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Prevalence and Distribution of Male Grooming-Related Injuries
This heatmap shows that injuries (n = 562) were most common in the scrotum (378 [67.2%]), followed by the penis (196 [34.8%]), and pubis (162 [28.9%]). Less common were the inner thigh (86 [15.3%]), perineum (52 [9.3%]), and anus (17 [3.1%]). Other areas account for 3.1%.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Prevalence and Distribution of Female Grooming-Related Injuries
This heatmap shows that injuries (n = 868) were most common at the pubis (445 [51.3%]), followed by the inner thigh (340 [44.9%]) and labia majora (369 [42.5%]). Less common were injuries to the perineum (115 [13.2%]) and the anus (48 [5.5%]). Other areas account for 1.4%.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Herbenick D, Hensel D, Smith NK, et al. . Pubic hair removal and sexual behavior: findings from a prospective daily diary study of sexually active women in the United States. J Sex Med. 2013;10(3):678-685. - PubMed
    1. Bercaw-Pratt JL, Santos XM, Sanchez J, Ayensu-Coker L, Nebgen DR, Dietrich JE. The incidence, attitudes and practices of the removal of pubic hair as a body modification. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25(1):12-14. - PubMed
    1. Butler SM, Smith NK, Collazo E, Caltabiano L, Herbenick D. Pubic hair preferences, reasons for removal, and associated genital symptoms: comparisons between men and women. J Sex Med. 2015;12(1):48-58. - PubMed
    1. Herbenick D, Reece M, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. Sexual behavior in the United States: results from a national probability sample of men and women ages 14-94. J Sex Med. 2010;7(suppl 5):255-265. - PubMed
    1. Herbenick D, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders S, Fortenberry JD. Pubic hair removal among women in the United States: prevalence, methods, and characteristics. J Sex Med. 2010;7(10):3322-3330. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms