Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Aug 1;57(8):1423-1431.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key121.

Two years of sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX: safety, efficacy and radiographic outcomes

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Two years of sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX: safety, efficacy and radiographic outcomes

Mark C Genovese et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

Objectives: To examine 2-year safety, efficacy and radiographic outcomes of sarilumab in adults with RA and inadequate response to MTX (MTX-IR).

Methods: In the randomized, placebo-controlled MOBILITY trial, MTX-IR patients received subcutaneous sarilumab (150 or 200 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks (q2w) plus MTX for up to 1 year. Upon study completion, patients could enrol in the open-label, long-term extension study (EXTEND, NCT011046652), in which all patients received sarilumab 200 mg q2w plus MTX. Dose reduction to 150 mg q2w was allowed for abnormal laboratory findings and per investigator's discretion.

Results: Of 1197 patients participating in MOBILITY, 901 entered EXTEND. Over the 2-year period, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious AEs occurred at rates of 279.6 events per 100 patient-years and 16.6 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. The most common TEAEs were neutropenia, injection site erythema, increased alanine aminotransferase and upper respiratory tract infections. After 1 year in the open-label, long-term extension, disease activity reached similar levels regardless of initial treatment. Modified total Sharp scores at year 1 were maintained through year 2. Best radiographic outcomes were observed in patients initially randomized to sarilumab 200 mg q2w. After dose reduction, 89.4% of patients continued the study through 2 years.

Conclusion: Sarilumab safety through year 2 was consistent with IL-6 receptor blockade. Clinical response was similar irrespective of initial treatment, and radiographic progression stabilized. Patients initiated on sarilumab 200 mg q2w had the best radiographic outcomes. Dose reduction allowed most patients to continue with the study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>ig</sc>. 1
Fig. 1
Clinical efficacy for patients completing 1 year of open-label extension, by original randomization (A) Mean DAS28-CRP scores. (B) Mean CDAI scores. (C) Proportion of patients achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 and CDAI remission (CDAI ≤2.8) in the ITT (year 1) and completer (year 2) populations. (D) Mean HAQ-DI scores. Data are for patients who completed the 52-week MOBILITY study and 1 year of the open-label extension (completer population). Patients were tabulated according to their original randomization group in MOBILITY. Numbers below the x-axes represent patients for whom data were available at a particular time point. CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index; ITT: intention-to-treat; q2w: every 2 weeks.
F<sc>ig</sc>. 2
Fig. 2
Radiographic progression in patients, by original randomization (A) Mean change from baseline in SHS (≤0). *Nominal P<0.01 vs placebo plus MTX. (B) Percentage of patients with no progression (change from baseline ≤0) of structural damage at year 2 for the OLE population. (C) Percentage of patients with no progression (change from baseline ≤0.5) of structural damage at year 2 for the OLE population. (D) Cumulative probability distribution plot for change in SHS at the end of year 2. OLE: open-label extension; q2w: every 2 weeks; SHS: modified Sharp–van der Heijde score.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW.. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2010;376:1094–108. - PubMed
    1. Upchurch KS, Kay J.. Evolution of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2012;51(Suppl 6):vi28–36. - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Landewe R, Bijlsma J. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:960–77. - PubMed
    1. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL. et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1–26. - PubMed
    1. Srirangan S, Choy EH.. The role of interleukin 6 in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2010;2:247–56. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types