Incitement, genocide, genocidal terror, and the upstream role of indoctrination: can epidemiologic models predict and prevent?
- PMID: 30377548
- PMCID: PMC6196410
- DOI: 10.1186/s40985-018-0106-7
Incitement, genocide, genocidal terror, and the upstream role of indoctrination: can epidemiologic models predict and prevent?
Abstract
We apply the models and tools of epidemiology and public health to propose a unified field theory showing the role of ideologies, indoctrination, and incitement, in genocide, genocidal terror, and terror by groups or individuals. We examine the effects of indoctrination and incitement as exposures and risks in relation to genocide and genocidal terror. Incitement has been recognized as a trigger to these outcomes but indoctrination is upstream to incitement. Population-wide exposure to indoctrination increases susceptibility to the effects of incitement. These relationships have been seen in all major genocides and genocidal terror in the late twentieth and twenty-first centuries. There is some insight into the relationship between ideology, incitement, and genocidal acts of violence from the so-called localized genocides in Bosnia, Rwanda, Darfur, Syria, and most recently, among the Rohingya in Myanmar. There is a need to recognize the upstream role of ideologies of hate in order to determine the degree to which indoctrination posed, and continues to pose, a contributing factor. Epidemiologic models, such as the iceberg model of exposure and disease and the concept of "sick individuals" and "sick populations," guide our understanding of the content and spread of indoctrination and incitement and can provide essential insights for prevention. The hateful indoctrination and ideologies behind genocidal violence must be countered and replaced by positive ideologies and role models that emphasize respect for life and human dignity for all.
Keywords: Epidemiology of genocide and genocidal terror; Incitement; Indoctrination.
Conflict of interest statement
Not applicableNot applicableThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
To prevent, react, and rebuild: health research and the prevention of genocide.Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 2):2027-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00331.x. Health Serv Res. 2004. PMID: 15544643 Free PMC article.
-
Double Jeopardy: Young adult mental and physical health outcomes following conception via genocidal rape during the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda.Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jun;278:113938. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113938. Epub 2021 Apr 15. Soc Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 33905987
-
A Pragmatic Epidemiological Approach to Confronting the Genocidal Death Effect of Homicide and Suicide among Young Black Males in the United States.Soc Work Public Health. 2020 Jan 2;35(1-2):47-67. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2020.1736705. Epub 2020 Mar 10. Soc Work Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32156202
-
Global Public Health Nursing.Public Health Nurs. 2022 Jan;39(1):350-359. doi: 10.1111/phn.13023. Epub 2021 Dec 8. Public Health Nurs. 2022. PMID: 34881464 Review.
-
Psychopathology of children of genocide survivors: a systematic review on the impact of genocide on their children`s psychopathology from five countries.Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):246-257. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw161. Int J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 27784741 Review.
References
-
- The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United Nations. 10 December 1948 http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/#atop. Accessed 7 May 2018.
-
- Heschel A. In: Is the holocaust unique? Perspectives on comparative genocide. Rosenbaum A, editor. Boulder: Westview Press; 2009.
-
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 260 A (III) of 9 December 1948 http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CrimeOfGenocide.aspx. Accessed 1 Dec 2017.
-
- Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court on 17 July 1998. Entry into force: 1 July 2002, in accordance with article 126. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/InternationalCriminal.... Accessed 1 December 2017.
-
- Judgment: Streicher. In: The Avalon Project. Yale University Lillian Goldman Law Library. 2008. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judstrei.asp. Accessed 1 Dec 2017.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources