Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;95(4):1036-1054.
doi: 10.1111/brv.12596. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

Infrasonic hearing in birds: a review of audiometry and hypothesized structure-function relationships

Affiliations
Review

Infrasonic hearing in birds: a review of audiometry and hypothesized structure-function relationships

Jeffrey N Zeyl et al. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

The perception of airborne infrasound (sounds below 20 Hz, inaudible to humans except at very high levels) has been documented in a handful of mammals and birds. While animals that produce vocalizations with infrasonic components (e.g. elephants) present conspicuous examples of potential use of infrasound in the context of communication, the extent to which airborne infrasound perception exists among terrestrial animals is unclear. Given that most infrasound in the environment arises from geophysical sources, many of which could be ecologically relevant, communication might not be the only use of infrasound by animals. Therefore, infrasound perception could be more common than currently realized. At least three bird species, each of which do not communicate using infrasound, are capable of detecting infrasound, but the associated auditory mechanisms are not well understood. Here we combine an evaluation of hearing measurements with anatomical observations to propose and evaluate hypotheses supporting avian infrasound detection. Environmental infrasound is mixed with non-acoustic pressure fluctuations that also occur at infrasonic frequencies. The ear can detect such non-acoustic pressure perturbations and therefore, distinguishing responses to infrasound from responses to non-acoustic perturbations presents a great challenge. Our review shows that infrasound could stimulate the ear through the middle ear (tympanic) route and by extratympanic routes bypassing the middle ear. While vibration velocities of the middle ear decline towards infrasonic frequencies, whole-body vibrations - which are normally much lower amplitude than that those of the middle ear in the 'audible' range (i.e. >20 Hz) - do not exhibit a similar decline and therefore may reach vibration magnitudes comparable to the middle ear at infrasonic frequencies. Low stiffness in the middle and inner ear is expected to aid infrasound transmission. In the middle ear, this could be achieved by large air cavities in the skull connected to the middle ear and low stiffness of middle ear structures; in the inner ear, the stiffness of round windows and cochlear partitions are key factors. Within the inner ear, the sizes of the helicotrema and cochlear aqueduct are expected to play important roles in shunting low-frequency vibrations away from low-frequency hair-cell sensors in the cochlea. The basilar papilla, the auditory organ in birds, responds to infrasound in some species, and in pigeons, infrasonic-sensitive neurons were traced back to the apical, abneural end of the basilar papilla. Vestibular organs and the paratympanic organ, a hair cell organ outside of the inner ear, are additional untested candidates for infrasound detection in birds. In summary, this review brings together evidence to create a hypothetical framework for infrasonic hearing mechanisms in birds and other animals.

Keywords: atmospheric pressure; avian hearing; basilar papilla; bone conduction; infrasound; low frequency hearing; paratympanic organ; vestibular organs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aibara, R., Welsh, J. T., Puria, S. & Goode, R. L. (2001). Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance. Hearing Research 152, 100-109.
    1. Arechvo, I., Zahnert, T., Bornitz, M., Neudert, M., Lasurashvili, N., Simkunaite-Rizgeliene, R. & Beleites, T. (2013). The ostrich middle ear for developing an ideal ossicular replacement prosthesis. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 270, 37-44.
    1. Art, J. J. & Fettiplace, R. (2006). Contribution of ionic currents to tuning in auditory hair cells. In Vertebrate Hair Cells (eds R. A. Eatock, R. R. Fay and A. N. Popper), pp. 204-248. Springer, New York, NY.
    1. Baker, C. V. H. & Modrell, M. S. (2018). Insights into electroreceptor development and evolution from molecular comparisons with hair cells. Integrative and Comparative Biology 58, 329-340.
    1. Bellono, N. W., Leitch, D. B. & Julius, D. (2017). Molecular basis of ancestral vertebrate electroreception. Nature 543, 391-396.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources