Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[3.8] bpo-38986: Make repr of C accelerated TaskWakeupMethWrapper the same as of pure Python version (GH-17484) #17493

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 7, 2019
Merged

[3.8] bpo-38986: Make repr of C accelerated TaskWakeupMethWrapper the same as of pure Python version (GH-17484) #17493

merged 1 commit into from Dec 7, 2019

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Dec 7, 2019 •
edited by bedevere-bot

(cherry picked from commit 969ae7a)

Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov andrew.svetlov@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue38986

@asvetlov @miss-islington
Make repr of C accelerated TaskWakeupMethWrapper the same as of pure …
fb3f37d 
…Python version (pythonGH-17484)

(cherry picked from commit 969ae7a)

Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2019
Merged
@asvetlov asvetlov changed the title [3.8] Make repr of C accelerated TaskWakeupMethWrapper the same as of pure Python version (GH-17484) [3.8] bpo-38986: Make repr of C accelerated TaskWakeupMethWrapper the same as of pure Python version (GH-17484) Dec 7, 2019
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

miss-islington commented Dec 7, 2019

@asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit ce0a2a8 into python:3.8 Dec 7, 2019
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-969ae7a-3.8 branch Dec 7, 2019
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

miss-islington commented Dec 7, 2019

@asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

miss-islington commented Dec 7, 2019

@asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@asvetlov asvetlov

@1st1 1st1

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@miss-islington @asvetlov @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot