New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cosmetic smtplib changes #8718
Cosmetic smtplib changes #8718
Conversation
I think the changes make sense, I am going to merge these. Thanks @scop for your contribution! |
Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: |
It looks to me like Azure Pipelines PR is stuck :( |
We didn't used to accept cosmetic changes like this unless there were other bugs being fixed in the same area. Well, the doc change is fine. The other seems safe as well, so I don't object to merging it, I just want to note that the CPython culture at least used to be "don't make code changes unless you are fixing a bug nearby". :) |
@bitdancer I thought that the conversion from 0/1 to False/True would be useful too so I ended up approving the changes :) |
Added automerge as @maxking had approved this and was just waiting for the CI to pass. |
Some cosmetic smtplib changes here. Let me know if you'd like a bpo/news entry or splitting this PR into two. Automerge-Triggered-By: @maxking
Some cosmetic smtplib changes here. Let me know if you'd like a bpo/news entry or splitting this PR into two.
Automerge-Triggered-By: @maxking
Automerge-Triggered-By: @csabella