Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upFixed incorrect unicodedata version in lexical_analysis.rst footnote #17710
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
the-knights-who-say-ni
commented
Dec 27, 2019
|
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). CLA MissingOur records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA: For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This is PR is invalidated if PR #17748 is accepted instead. |
nmassman commentedDec 27, 2019
•
edited by bedevere-bot
While fiddling with the unicode documentation for issue bpo-22593, I found one of the footnote hyperlinks in Docs/reference/lexical_analysis.rst still had an old unicode version. I updated it to match the current unicode version in Tools/unicode/makeunicodedata.py and other existing links in documentation.
I'm assuming this qualifies as a trivial change, thus I have not submitted a new issue for this change.