Skip to content

bpo-34749: Improved performance of binascii.a2b_base64(). #9444

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 14, 2019

Conversation

sir-sigurd
Copy link
Contributor

@sir-sigurd sir-sigurd commented Sep 20, 2018

@csabella
Copy link
Contributor

csabella commented May 22, 2019

@encukou, there are now merge conflicts between this and GH-4108 (bpo-31862). Do you think the changes here would be compatible with the other changes being proposed for upcoming PEPs? Thanks!

@encukou
Copy link
Member

encukou commented May 23, 2019

The conflicts look minor (though Git rightly thinks they're better left to humans). I don't know about all upcoming PEPs, but I'm not aware of conflicts.
Unfortunately I won't have time for review in the next few months :(

@csabella
Copy link
Contributor

@encukou, thank you for the response. This one may need to wait a little longer until a reviewer is available then.

Copy link
Member

@encukou encukou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've rebased on top of the module state changes in master.
I can still see the speedup, can't find any new bugs, and I haven't been able to speed it up more :)

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@sir-sigurd: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 1c5e68e into python:master Jul 14, 2019
@sir-sigurd sir-sigurd deleted the a2b_base64 branch July 14, 2019 13:36
@sir-sigurd
Copy link
Contributor Author

@encukou, thanks for rebasing it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants