Perfect your code
With built-in code review tools, GitHub makes it easy to raise the quality bar before you ship. Join the 40 million developers who've merged over 200 million pull requests.
Sign up for free See pricing for teams and enterprisesbpo-39041: Add GitHub Actions support #17594
Conversation
Should make sure to add doc-building workflow. I would also build against |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I changed the VM images to "latest", but it still seems best to have static labels. I also added the coverage test run after we know the Ubuntu tests have passed, but I don't know that we'll want the extra delay. Maybe if I split it into a separate check we can make the coverage run optional? We'll have to merge this one first though. Once I get the docs workflow in then we can do that and iterate on the coverage run. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Yeah, I would split the coverage run out as a separate thing as we don't rely on it to prevent coverage slippage. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
miss-islington
commented
Jan 6, 2020
Thanks @zooba for the PR |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
miss-islington
commented
Jan 6, 2020
Thanks @zooba for the PR |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bedevere-bot
commented
Jan 6, 2020
GH-17868 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bedevere-bot
commented
Jan 6, 2020
GH-17869 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch. |
zooba commentedDec 13, 2019
•
edited by bedevere-bot
https://bugs.python.org/issue39041