Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-39303: [WIP] Refactor cmd module #17951

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
from

Conversation

@dan1994
Copy link

dan1994 commented Jan 11, 2020

Hello everyone!

As stated in the issue, I'm new to contributing to open source, but would love to contribute to python!

Any comments about styling, testing, or even things like breaking this issue into smaller issues would be highly appreciated!

https://bugs.python.org/issue39303

dan1994 added 6 commits Jan 10, 2020
…/o providing a default implementation. This makes us preform ugly checks that would otherwise be unnecessary. Also, it would be pretty simple to add a generic alias mechanism instead of allowing only the built in ? and !
@the-knights-who-say-ni

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

the-knights-who-say-ni commented Jan 11, 2020

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Recognized GitHub username

We couldn't find a bugs.python.org (b.p.o) account corresponding to the following GitHub usernames:

@dan1994

This might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in one's b.p.o account settings. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at this contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

Copy link
Member

corona10 left a comment

https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/cmd.html

Thanks for the contribution, however, this change will affect the public APIs of the cmd module.
This kind of work should be processed after the discussion with core developers.

@dan1994

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

dan1994 commented Jan 11, 2020

Where should such a discussion be held, and how would I contact the core developers?
In any case, at least for the time being, I preserve existing APIs, and only partition into functions (although in my opinion there are some changes that will benefit the module).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.