Skip to content

[3.7] bpo-39348: Fix code highlight for the SOCK_NONBLOCK example (GH-18018) #18020

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jan 15, 2020

The previous double colon was wrongly place directly after Therefore.
Which produced a block without syntax highlighting. This fixes it
by separating the double colon from the text. As a result, sphinx now
properly highlights the python code.

https://bugs.python.org/issue39348
(cherry picked from commit fad8b56)

Co-authored-by: Oz N Tiram oz.tiram@noris.de

https://bugs.python.org/issue39348

…-18018)

The previous double colon was wrongly place directly after Therefore.
Which produced a block without syntax highlighting. This fixes it
by separating the double colon from the text. As a result, sphinx now
properly highlights the python code.

https://bugs.python.org/issue39348
(cherry picked from commit fad8b56)

Co-authored-by: Oz N Tiram <oz.tiram@noris.de>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@oz123: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 970188c into python:3.7 Jan 16, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-fad8b56-3.7 branch January 16, 2020 00:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants