Skip to content

[3.8] bpo-32989: IDLE - fix bad editor call of pyparse method (GH-5968) #18096

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jan 21, 2020

Fix comments and add tests for editor newline_and_indent_event method.
Remove unused None default for function parameter of pyparse find_good_parse_start method
and code triggered by that default.

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy tjreedy@udel.edu
(cherry picked from commit ec64640)

Co-authored-by: Cheryl Sabella cheryl.sabella@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue32989

Fix comments and add tests for editor newline_and_indent_event method.
Remove unused None default for function parameter of pyparse find_good_parse_start method
and code triggered by that default.

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
(cherry picked from commit ec64640)

Co-authored-by: Cheryl Sabella <cheryl.sabella@gmail.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@csabella and @terryjreedy: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 060ad2f into python:3.8 Jan 21, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-ec64640-3.8 branch January 21, 2020 10:29
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@csabella and @terryjreedy: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@csabella and @terryjreedy: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants