Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-32173: linecache.py add lazycache to __all__ and use dict.clear to clear the cache #4641

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 26, 2020

Conversation

@ganziqim
Copy link
Contributor

ganziqim commented Nov 30, 2017

@the-knights-who-say-ni

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

the-knights-who-say-ni commented Nov 30, 2017

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

Copy link
Contributor

lisroach left a comment

I think this is a reasonable diff, lazycache should be added to all and the clearcache is improved by using clear().

The extra code changes are just semantics which help code readability without changing any functionality.

@ganziqim

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

ganziqim commented Dec 3, 2017

I've been signed for three times, but the state has not changed

@asvetlov

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

asvetlov commented Dec 3, 2017

CLA status updated

@ganziqim ganziqim force-pushed the ganziqim:master branch from 1e19632 to ee8a2b9 Dec 4, 2017
@ganziqim

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

ganziqim commented Dec 4, 2017

news entry added

@asvetlov asvetlov self-assigned this Dec 4, 2017
@bedevere-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

bedevere-bot commented Jan 6, 2018

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@csabella

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

csabella commented Mar 17, 2019

This issue is approved by 2 core developers, but was waiting on an update to the blurb.

@ganziqim Please make the last changes requested by Mariatta, after which I believe this will be ready to merge. Thanks!

@ganziqim ganziqim force-pushed the ganziqim:master branch 2 times, most recently from d097431 to 4b004f7 Mar 18, 2019
@ganziqim ganziqim force-pushed the ganziqim:master branch from 4b004f7 to a15377c Mar 18, 2019
@ganziqim

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

ganziqim commented Mar 18, 2019

This issue is approved by 2 core developers, but was waiting on an update to the blurb.

@ganziqim Please make the last changes requested by Mariatta, after which I believe this will be ready to merge. Thanks!

done.

@csabella

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

csabella commented Mar 18, 2019

@ganziqim Thanks!

@lisroach @asvetlov I believe Mariatta is out of open source starting today, so, if you can, please review the changes made to the news entry. Thank you!

@csabella csabella merged commit 4515a59 into python:master Jan 26, 2020
5 checks passed
5 checks passed
Azure Pipelines PR #20190318.15 succeeded
Details
bedevere/issue-number Issue number 32173 found
Details
bedevere/news News entry found in Misc/NEWS.d
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
7 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.