Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-36620 [First-time contributor] Update itertools.rst add optional args to function definitions. #13210

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

yingw787
Copy link
Contributor

@yingw787 yingw787 commented May 8, 2019

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

the-knights-who-say-ni commented May 8, 2019

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA (this might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in your b.p.o account settings). This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for your contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels May 8, 2019
@yingw787
Copy link
Contributor Author

yingw787 commented May 8, 2019

@lisroach pls review thanks :)

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Update itertools documentation with optional args registration.
Copy link
Contributor

@lisroach lisroach May 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you actually remove the NEWS entry? For small documentation fixes an NEWS entry isn't really needed, and can end up cluttering up the news at the end of the day.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@yingw787 yingw787 May 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lisroach should be removed! I thought it was required because the CI checks had a large red X on not having a NEWS entry filled out, then the category disappeared after I filled it out (not sure if it's because I filled it out and it completed or if the CI checks deleted the category after PR instantiation).

Copy link
Contributor Author

@yingw787 yingw787 May 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay I get it now; the .rst file must be present but the entry is "skip news" for the bot to skip news. Updated.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

bedevere-bot commented May 8, 2019

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@rhettinger rhettinger self-assigned this May 9, 2019
@rhettinger rhettinger closed this May 10, 2019
jcfr added a commit to python-cmake-buildsystem/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2020
…om VS2008 to VS2010."

This commit is a partial backport of python/cpython@401f9f3. It was
originally designed to work with python-cmake-buildsystem.

The following modules have NOT been backported:

* Tools/msi
* Tools/buildbot
* PCBuild
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting changes docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants