Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Oops.] Misspelling of "Ackermann" as "Ackerman" #181

Open
echuber2 opened this issue Oct 12, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

[Oops.] Misspelling of "Ackermann" as "Ackerman" #181

echuber2 opened this issue Oct 12, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@echuber2
Copy link

@echuber2 echuber2 commented Oct 12, 2019

Error is present in June 13 version.

Chapter number or note title: Section 7.5

Page number: p. 267

Error description: footnote mentions "inverse Ackerman" [sic]

Suggested fix (if any): I think it's spelled "Ackermann" (two n)

I just realized this version of the book doesn't include the longer notes on disjoint sets from the old course notes. Sad feels.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant
You can’t perform that action at this time.