Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[Oops.] Misspelling of "Ackermann" as "Ackerman" #181
Comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Error is present in June 13 version.
Chapter number or note title: Section 7.5
Page number: p. 267
Error description: footnote mentions "inverse Ackerman" [sic]
Suggested fix (if any): I think it's spelled "Ackermann" (two n)
I just realized this version of the book doesn't include the longer notes on disjoint sets from the old course notes. Sad feels.