Skip to content
#

testing-tool

Here are 128 public repositories matching this topic...

pavelloz
pavelloz commented Feb 8, 2020

Hey,

Im going through examples in readme and in https://volument.com/baretest but as far as i can tell, just copy pasting them throws errors.

It would be nice to have a repo to clone to:

  1. see how to set it up. currently i dont understand what this supposed to be const test = require('.')('sum'), in docs. And its not lack of my js knowledge that bothers me.
  2. verify the performance cl
folkyatina
folkyatina commented Mar 5, 2020

Downloading section says that all you should do is to add

id 'marathon' version 'X.X.X'

to your build.gradle to add the plugin, but it will not work without this little magic in settings.gradle:

pluginManagement {
    resolutionStrategy {
        eachPlugin {
            if (requested.id.id == "marathon") {
        
ZeroDot1
ZeroDot1 commented Nov 1, 2019

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It takes far too long to test all URLs of a list (Slow Internet).
It would therefore be very good if you could check a list of URLs only for incorrect URLs.
Without DNS query or so, only a check if all URLs are correct and if no errors have occurred e.g. a dot at the end of a URL.

Describe the solution you'd like
When I

andrey-semakin
andrey-semakin commented Jan 6, 2020

Describe the bug
pytest shows following warning:

============= warnings summary ================
/path/to/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/_pytest/mark/structures.py:325
  /path/to/venv/lib/python3.7/site-packages/_pytest/mark/structures.py:325: PytestUnknownMarkWarning: Unknown pytest.mark.testrail - is this a typo?  You can register custom marks to avoid this warning - for detai
echebbi
echebbi commented Feb 17, 2020

Bug description

SonarCloud always report 0% coverage

Expected behavior

SonarCloud should report the right coverage.

How to reproduce

Build an internal branch/PR on Travis CI.

Additional context

It looks like Sonar team has deprecated usage of JaCoCo's .exec files and doesn't take them into account anymore. [Here](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/coverage-test-

pjljvandelaar
pjljvandelaar commented Dec 13, 2018

The following model is accepted by TorXakis:

PROCDEF p [Input1, Input2 :: Int; Output :: Int] () ::=
        Input1 ? x 
    >-> Input2 ? y [[ x <> y ]] 
    >-> Output ! x + y | Input1 ?x | Input2 ?y [[ x == y ]]
    >-> Output ! x + y
    >-> STOP
ENDDEF

CHANDEF chans ::= Input1,Input2, Output :: Int ENDDEF

MODELDEF M ::=
    CHAN IN Input1, Input2
    CHAN OUT Output
    SY
cyucelen
cyucelen commented Feb 18, 2020

Problem:

When asserting http headers, it is verbose to create expected http headers.

Such as:

expectedHeader := http.Header{}
expectedHeader.Add("X-If-You-Read-This", "send-a-hadouken-back")
requestRecorder.AssertHeaderEqual(t, expectedHeader)

Solution:

A wrapper for creating http.Header and adding the initial key-value pair can be written for conciseness.

8bitzz
8bitzz commented Apr 12, 2019

Cảm ơn bạn đã viết bài Tutorial bằng tiếng Việt. Mình google rất khó để tìm dc tài liệu để sử dụng cho dự án của mình 😥

Cty mình cũng đã xài Charles 1 thời gian dài, và dần chuyển qua Proxyman, 1 tool mà team mình tìm thấy feature trên Product Hunt.

Về cơ bản, Proxyman như Charles, và cực kỳ dễ xài. App tự làm hết mấy bướ

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the testing-tool topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the testing-tool topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more

You can’t perform that action at this time.