Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(): update scripts to use colorette instead of turbocolor #21349

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 20, 2020
Merged

Conversation

@liamdebeasi
Copy link
Member

@liamdebeasi liamdebeasi commented May 20, 2020

Pull request checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)
  • Build (npm run build) was run locally and any changes were pushed
  • Lint (npm run lint) has passed locally and any fixes were made for failures

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces:

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other (please describe):

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: fixes #21347

What is the new behavior?

  • Removed turbocolor, using colorette instead

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

@liamdebeasi liamdebeasi changed the title chore(): scripts to use colorette instead of turbocolor chore(): update scripts to use colorette instead of turbocolor May 20, 2020
@liamdebeasi liamdebeasi merged commit c680705 into master May 20, 2020
2 checks passed
@liamdebeasi liamdebeasi deleted the colorette branch May 20, 2020
@aparajita
Copy link

@aparajita aparajita commented May 20, 2020

That was fast! Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants