data-science
Here are 15,143 public repositories matching this topic...
Describe the issue linked to the documentation
Follows from #17387
Suggest a potential alternative/fix
Stop referencing preprocessing functions e.g. :
maxabs_scale
minmax_scale
normalize
quantile_transform
robust_scale
scale
power_transform
in the UG, and only add them e.g. in the "See Also" sections, or even just in the API ref.
In particular right now the first entr
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have a lot of trouble distinguishing between the shades of green signifying a running vs successful query in sqllab.
Describe the solution you'd like
Ideally these would be two different colors for running vs successful. Maybe yellow and green respectively?
Describe alternatives you've considered
If there isn't
-
Updated
Oct 1, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Oct 1, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Oct 8, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Oct 15, 2020 - Python
There are many places where we could make use of Pathlib.
Look for any places that uses with open(...)
and ask yourself:
- is the argument a string ?
- would it make sens to make it a
Path()
, - how far upstream in the code can I make it a Path.
Don't try to bite more than you can chew (or more than I can review), try to fix 1 place at a time.
-
Updated
Oct 15, 2020
When running in cluster mode, passing references does not work, e.g.,:
auto r3 = Ray::Task(Return1).Remote();
auto r4 = Ray::Task(Plus1, r3).Remote(); // passing r3 as reference argument
CC @SongGuyang
- I have verified my script runs in a clean environment and reproduces the issue.
- I have verified the issue also occurs with the [latest wheels](https://docs.ray.io/en
In recent versions (can't say from exactly when), there seems to be an off-by-one error in dcc.DatePickerRange. I set max_date_allowed = datetime.today().date()
, but in the calendar, yesterday is the maximum date allowed. I see it in my apps, and it is also present in the first example on the DatePickerRange documentation page.
E
-
Updated
Oct 12, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
Summary
Possibly a regression from the recent st.balloons upgrade? Or maybe was always the case.
Steps to reproduce
st.header("Results")
if st.button("Press me!"):
st.balloons()
st.header("hm")
Click on the button.
Expected behavior:
No space inserted after clicking on the button.
(E.g. st.empty() would not take up space there)
Probably just need to mark
Not a high-priority at all, but it'd be more sensible for such a tutorial/testing utility corpus to be implemented elsewhere - maybe under /test/
or some other data- or doc- related module – rather than in gensim.models.word2vec
.
Originally posted by @gojomo in RaRe-Technologies/gensim#2939 (comment)
-
Updated
May 20, 2020
-
Updated
Oct 1, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Oct 6, 2020
-
Updated
Jul 31, 2020
-
Updated
Oct 14, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
May 10, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Oct 14, 2020
more details at: allenai/allennlp#2264 (comment)
🚀 Feature
Parse the Readme and replace generated badges by downloaded ones
- process in setup.py
- parse all badges from online CI and save them as png (svg is problematic, does not work for all plaforms)
2 replace badges in Readme with the downloaded ones
Motivation
pipy page does not work well with generated badges and also projecting the master state to a given release do
-
Updated
Oct 15, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Oct 3, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Oct 15, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Oct 10, 2020 - Python
The UI of the scatterplot has got more ugly between 3.4 and the current development version.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior: create any scatterplot facet.
Current Results (master)
Expected Behavior (3.4)
, because some of these examples are now being rendered in the docs.
Added by @fchollet in requests for contributions.