-
Updated
Nov 2, 2020 - Python
async-await
Here are 951 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Oct 5, 2020
Steps to reproduce
futures-preview = { version = "0.3.0-alpha.19", features = [ "async-await" ] }
inCargo.toml
as recommended in §3.1.- Try to build the example in https://book.async.rs/tutorial/sending_messages.html
use futures::channel::mpsc; // 1
use futures::sink::SinkExt;
use std::sync::Arc;
type Sender<T> = mpsc::UnboundedSender<T>; // 2
type Receiver<T> =
-
Updated
Oct 20, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 31, 2018 - HTML
-
Updated
Aug 4, 2020 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Mar 4, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 29, 2020 - C#
-
Updated
Nov 1, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
Aug 26, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Nov 1, 2020 - Rust
-
Updated
Oct 13, 2020 - Java
-
Updated
Jul 30, 2019
-
Updated
May 15, 2020 - Swift
-
Updated
Sep 11, 2020 - Vue
-
Updated
Oct 31, 2018 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 29, 2020 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jul 10, 2020 - Swift
-
Updated
Jun 9, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Sep 7, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 29, 2019 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 12, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jul 16, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 31, 2020 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Oct 26, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 4, 2017 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Mar 16, 2020 - Rust
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the async-await topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the async-await topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
What should happen if deliver_cancel raises an exception? In the current implementation, the shielded cancel scope will prevent it from propagating until the process exits, which might take a while if the crash occurred before signaling the process in any way. Maybe on exception from a user-specified deliver_cancel we should call the default deliver_cancel to kill the process? Or just kill() since