bpo-41559: Implement PEP 612 - Add ParamSpec and Concatenate to typing #23702
Conversation
I'm sorry, I didn't get to the end of this review (not by far), but I have a few comments. Main thing though is, did you look at all the examples in PEP 612? It seems that for user-defined generic classes that have a ParamSpec parameter, things like X[int, P]
are actually valid.
Maybe this indirectly also answers your question: I think that the ParamSpec should be included in __parameters__
.
Also, I wonder if we could do less type checking at runtime rather than trying to be strict? I desperately want typing.py to shrink, not grow... :-)
Points taken. Sorry D'oh, I just realised I answered my own question since we need |
Co-Authored-By: Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum@users.noreply.github.com>
also reduced runtime checks
Let's wait until #23060 has landed and then see what adjustments this might need. |
Finally looking at this...
Yeah, ParamSpec is super special, and you can't do anything with it that isn't explicitly mentioned in the PEP. So it's debatable whether So let's not worry about those clearly wrong cases. |
Sorry, submitted too soon. (UPDATE: Not, I made a mistake -- or GitHub did. :-) |
Excellent work! Thanks for your perseverance. My feedback is mostly simple improvements.
Objects/genericaliasobject.c
Outdated
} | ||
// convert all the lists inside args to tuples to help | ||
// with caching in other libaries if substituting a ParamSpec | ||
if (PyList_CheckExact(subst) && is_paramspec(arg)) { |
Why only do this for ParamSpec?
I'm afraid of existing code relying on substituting typevars in genericalias with lists, then expecting that list to be inside __args__
. Although in Python 3.9 that should be invalid, and the IDE/type checker should warn the users about that already.
If I just convert list to tuples for all cases, the C code will become way simpler :).
There can't be much code yet relying about anything for GenericAlias -- it's new in 3.9. We could backport that particular behavior to 3.9.3 to ensure there won't be any more code relying on it. :-)
Co-Authored-By: Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum@users.noreply.github.com>
Re: the 3.9 issues that you discovered: maybe create a PR for those first, land that in master and 3.9 branch, then merge master into this PR?
Guido, thank you so much for all the time you've put into reviewing this PR! I learnt quite a bit about the typing module in the process :).
Yeah I agree, I created #23915 for that. Once that one lands, I'll merge the changes in along with some of your suggestions. |
I think it’s ready! |
@Fidget-Spinner Let me know if you agree. |
Yes! Sorry, I thought you were going to merge it in so I was waiting too |
I figured that was the case. :-) |
@gvanrossum: Please replace |
@gvanrossum Oh dang I knew I had a hunch I missed something :/. I forgot to convert all lists to tuples in ga_new/setup_ga too (I did it only for getitem and co.). Well on the bright side, having that as a separate PR makes backporting to 3.9 easier if anything :), and anyways lists aren't valid in genericalias other than the Callable case (which we already have covered), so we won't have anything broken even without that in right now. |
I'll fix that some other time, right now I'm celebrating |
Changes:
__parameters__
) in:Documentation will be another patch.
https://bugs.python.org/issue41559
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: