New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-42999: expand and clarify pathlib.Path.link_to()
documentation.
#24294
Conversation
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
Wow, this issue still doesn't get addressed after so many months. So when can we even progress to the next step to fix this historical problem and implement a correct version of this function... More days we wait, more compromises caused by this prolonging historical mistake will take place in downstream developments. |
I haven't been particularly vocal about getting this reviewed (IRL commitments), so I wouldn't take it as indicative of Python development in general. |
d59debe
to
f7640fd
Compare
Didn't I merge this one yesterday? I was sure I did... |
Thanks @barneygale for the PR, and @zooba for merging it |
Sorry, @barneygale and @zooba, I could not cleanly backport this to |
Sorry @barneygale and @zooba, I had trouble checking out the |
GH-25257 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
…H-24294) Co-authored-by: Barney Gale <barney.gale@gmail.com>
…ythonGH-24294) Co-authored-by: Barney Gale <barney.gale@gmail.com>
GH-25258 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
…H-24294) Co-authored-by: Barney Gale <barney.gale@gmail.com>
Replace:
With:
Add warning that the argument order is reversed from what's expected.
Move
link_to()
directly undersymlink_to()
for ease of comparison (docs + code)See also: https://bugs.python.org/issue39950
https://bugs.python.org/issue42999