Trivial change in fractions module docs: real -> rational numbers #25009
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Obviously, the former was a little misleading: not only rationals may be considered as "infinite-precision, real numbers" - but, for example, any real finite extension of the rationals.
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
nanjekyejoannah
approved these changes
May 29, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Obviously, the former was a little misleading: not only rationals
may be considered as "infinite-precision, real numbers" - but, for
example, any real finite extension of the rationals.