-
Updated
May 1, 2021
async
Here are 4,389 public repositories matching this topic...
Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Go to 'https://react-query.tanstack.com/examples/nextjs'
- Click on 'Nextjs SSG'
- Scroll down to '....'
- 502 Bad Gateaway
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
Screenshots
If applicable, add screensho
-
Updated
Apr 26, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Apr 28, 2021 - C++
-
Updated
Jan 6, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
May 1, 2021 - Rust
[server] Add warning when a cookie's length would exceed the RFC 6265 minimum user-agent support
We had a report in aiohttp-session
(see aio-libs/aiohttp-session#574) that a user submitting a 'large' cookie had the cookie dropped by the receiving browser.
According to RFC 6265 - section 6.1:
General-use user agents SHOULD
provide each of the following minimum
-
Updated
Apr 30, 2021 - Kotlin
-
Updated
Apr 12, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Apr 30, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 13, 2021 - C++
-
Updated
May 2, 2021 - C++
-
Updated
Apr 22, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
May 1, 2021 - Python
Stitching API
Opencv provide a Stitching module/API
Bascially, i would like to be able to rewrite stitching_detailed.cpp in javascript
This includes :
- Stitcher class
- Features extractors (already implemented in opencv4nodejs)
- Estimator
I have trouble using (or understanding how to use) sqlx::Type
. I have derived it for a wrapper around a String
.
As far as I understand, this should implement Encode
and Decode
traits for the wrapper type and as a consequence I should be able to pass an instance of the wrapper type to query!
macro, but I get an error stating that the drivers expects an &str
instead of the wrapper type.
the current demo.gif
dates back to gitui 0.7
(July 2020) and could use some refresh and maybe even some professional hand that adds some subtitles that explain what you see.
-
Updated
Apr 26, 2021 - Java
What should happen if deliver_cancel raises an exception? In the current implementation, the shielded cancel scope will prevent it from propagating until the process exits, which might take a while if the crash occurred before signaling the process in any way. Maybe on exception from a user-specified deliver_cancel we should call the default deliver_cancel to kill the process? Or just kill() since
-
Updated
Apr 20, 2021 - Go
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the async topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the async topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
First check