Using asyncio #25814
Using asyncio #25814
Conversation
if you wants to start a background task with a unsyncronous function using async threading does not support it until now. What i just did is to check is the target function is unsycronous and if it is true, execute it with asyncio Hope it will be helpfull
|
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). Recognized GitHub usernameWe couldn't find a bugs.python.org (b.p.o) account corresponding to the following GitHub usernames: This might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in one's b.p.o account settings. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at this contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
|
@wartonbega Could you open a bugs.python.org issue for this request? As a new feature it will definitely need discussion. I'd encourage you to discuss your use case more; on the face of it, it doesn't make much sense to run an async task in a thread, because the asyncio event loop itself is not thread-safe. For this PR to move forward, you'll have to at least add unit tests and a news entry. |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
|
This PR's been abandoned. Closing. Fortunately, the blocking wrapper a user needs to run asyncio in a new thread is minimal at this point. |
if you wants to start a background task with a unsyncronous function using async threading does not support it until now.
What i just did is to check is the target function is unsycronous and if it is true, execute it with asyncio
Hope it will be helpfull