Skip to content

/ rclone

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rclone sync, detail is missing for deleted directories #5281

Open
Sephiburp opened this issue Apr 27, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Rclone sync, detail is missing for deleted directories #5281

Sephiburp opened this issue Apr 27, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement good first issue

Comments

@Sephiburp
Copy link

@Sephiburp Sephiburp commented Apr 27, 2021 •
edited by ncw

The associated forum post URL from https://forum.rclone.org

https://forum.rclone.org/t/rclone-sync-detail-is-missing-for-deleted-directories/23793/2

What is your current rclone version (output from rclone version)?

rclone v1.56.0-DEV

What problem are you are trying to solve?

Get the info of which directories were deleted.
Command used: rclone sync --update --log-level=INFO "myGoogleDrive:myDir" "/media/myDir"

How do you think rclone should be changed to solve that?

"This log needs promoting to fs.Infof" (see forum)

How to use GitHub

  • Please use the 👍 reaction to show that you are affected by the same issue.
  • Please don't comment if you have no relevant information to add. It's just extra noise for everyone subscribed to this issue.
  • Subscribe to receive notifications on status change and new comments.
@ncw
Copy link
Member

@ncw ncw commented Apr 27, 2021

Here is the log in question.

rclone/fs/operations/operations.go

Line 1046 in 0537791

fs.Debugf(fs.LogDirName(f, dir), "Removing directory")

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement good first issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
@ncw @Sephiburp