This is more of a question with a potential follow-up suggestion: in the genre column, we do have drama/thriller and thriller/drama

Is there a valid reason behind this? If not, I would suggest making it more consistent (eg: pick one between the two and use it consistently across the list), so that sorting it properly groups them.

Also: since we do have categories already, why the column

App Attest allows your app to attach a hardware-backed assertion as a part of the request. Your server can use assertion to verify the request came from your genuine app, on a genuine Apple device.

https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2021/10244/

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/assessing_fraud_risk

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/entit

Hello spoooopyyy hackers 🎃

This is a Hacktoberfest only issue! 👻

This is also data-sciency!

The Problem

Our English dictionary contains words that aren't English, and does not contain common English words.

Examples of non-common words in the dictionary:

"hlithskjalf",
  "hlorrithi",
  "hlqn",
  "hm",
  "hny",
  "ho",
  "hoactzin",
  "hoactzine

A common protocol structure is to have a header containing a length field, followed by data of length bytes, followed by additional protocol fields such as a CRC. If the length field is variable, the position of subsequent URH-specified protocol fields defined by fixed position will not be in the correct location.

I do not know the best way to address this, but quick and easy way to support

It has been a pleasure for me to contribute to all of you 2 versions of this tool.

I've been working on other open source projects that I'm about to release for you, so I haven't finished trape version 3.0.

But, I invite you and the entire community that has used this project, to collaborate with some lines of code, implementing your own ideas and improving trape, turning it into a project o

⭐ Challenge idea

Description

Several users originally missing security question answers - most notably bjoern.k

RustScan has an accessible mode, rustscan --accessible which should promise not to have any weird ASCII text in it.

Write CI that runs RustScan with --accessible a few times, with different flags / options and check the terminal output to see if it contains one of these:

1. [!]
2. [~]
3. [>]
4. | {}

If any of these characters appear in any of the tests, fail the CI. E

This may be pretty useful since if a user gets an output that contains unwanted entries, they can easily tweak filtration settings.