App Attest allows your app to attach a hardware-backed assertion as a part of the request. Your server can use assertion to verify the request came from your genuine app, on a genuine Apple device.

https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2021/10244/

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/assessing_fraud_risk

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/entit

Hello spoooopyyy hackers 🎃

This is a Hacktoberfest only issue! 👻

This is also data-sciency!

The Problem

Our English dictionary contains words that aren't English, and does not contain common English words.

Examples of non-common words in the dictionary:

"hlithskjalf",
  "hlorrithi",
  "hlqn",
  "hm",
  "hny",
  "ho",
  "hoactzin",
  "hoactzine

I testing bruteforce my opencart store.

this is body request:

-----------------------------34237939373614592773956005873
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="username"

^USER^
-----------------------------34237939373614592773956005873
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="password"

^PASS^
-----------------------------34237939373614592773956005873
Content-Disposition: form-dat

Can we have a feature where a normal brute force is running based on HTTP response like 403/401 do a recursive brute force on that endpoint?

⭐ Challenge idea

Description

Several users originally missing security question answers - most notably bjoern.k

RustScan has an accessible mode, rustscan --accessible which should promise not to have any weird ASCII text in it.

Write CI that runs RustScan with --accessible a few times, with different flags / options and check the terminal output to see if it contains one of these:

1. [!]
2. [~]
3. [>]
4. | {}

If any of these characters appear in any of the tests, fail the CI. E

What would you like to happen?
The sections 4.7.11.1 Testing for Local File Inclusion & 4.7.11.2 Testing for Remote File Inclusion address two attack vectors that are very similar one to the other. Given this situation and the few documentation on the Remote injection one, my proposal would be to merge both in a single section called Testing for File Injection.

Is there a way to skip the nmap scan and go straight to the attacking routes? In case i already know the target list is full of open rtsp port IPs.