New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-43853: Expand test suite for SQLite UDF's #27642
bpo-43853: Expand test suite for SQLite UDF's #27642
Conversation
FYI: Tests for aggregate functions are already in place (implemented in GH-27588). @serhiy-storchaka, is the refactor commit acceptable? Code coverage is preserved. |
Ignore my comments about values which cause errors. I covered them in #27654. But please add more test cases for valid values of different types. |
I've updated the PR. PTAL, @serhiy-storchaka. |
Resolved: only test arguments passed to UDF's |
@serhiy-storchaka, please take a new look. |
Thanks, @JelleZijlstra! |
@gvanrossum I think this one can be merged. (Though maybe Serhyi should review it again? It's been a few months and the change seems low risk.) |
@erlend-aasland Do you want to land it? |
Yes, it would be nice to land this. |
Go ahead and land it! |
I can't; I don't have the commit bit :) |
What?! I thought you did. You should. Who's mentoring you? |
Thanks @erlend-aasland for the PR, and @gvanrossum for merging it |
Sorry, @erlend-aasland and @gvanrossum, I could not cleanly backport this to |
Sorry @erlend-aasland and @gvanrossum, I had trouble checking out the |
I was surprised when I learned that too, I feel like I've seen your name around CPython a lot :) |
First @corona10, now @pablogsal (BTW, I'll fix the backports.) |
I've been around a year or two, IIRC :) |
We have already offer the promotion a couple of times, we are working on it |
(cherry picked from commit 3eb3b4f) Co-authored-by: Erlend Egeberg Aasland <erlend.aasland@innova.no>
GH-31030 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
Backporting to 3.9 from GH-31030. |
PyFloat_AsDouble()
errorshttps://bugs.python.org/issue43853
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: