-
Updated
Mar 28, 2021
distributed-computing
Here are 1,101 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Aug 6, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
May 13, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
Aug 6, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 14, 2017 - Python
-
Updated
Apr 23, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 6, 2021 - PHP
Similar to dask/dask#7800, we can replace our tmpfile
context manager
with tempfile.TemporaryFile
from the standard library.
-
Updated
Aug 6, 2021 - C#
-
Updated
Jul 30, 2021 - HTML
-
Updated
Dec 31, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Jul 29, 2021 - C
-
Updated
Jun 25, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Jun 30, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 17, 2021 - PHP
-
Updated
May 20, 2021
-
Updated
Aug 3, 2021 - C++
-
Updated
Nov 17, 2020 - C#
-
Updated
Aug 6, 2021 - R
It seems that the number of joining clients (not the num of computing clients) is fixed in fedml_api/data_preprocessing/**/data_loader and cannot be changed except CIFAR10 datasets.
Here I mean that it seems the total clients is decided by the datasets, rather the input from run_fedavg_distributed_pytorch.sh.
https://github.com/FedML-AI/FedML/blob/3d9fda8d149c95f25ec4898e31df76f035a33b5d/fed
-
Updated
Dec 16, 2018 - Rust
-
Updated
Mar 6, 2021 - Haskell
-
Updated
May 12, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Nov 5, 2019
-
Updated
Apr 6, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
Nov 3, 2020 - Go
If enter_data()
is called with the same train_path
twice in a row and the data itself hasn't changed, a new Dataset does not need to be created.
We should add a column which stores some kind of hash of the actual data. When a Dataset would be created, if the metadata and data hash are exactly the same as an existing Dataset, nothing should be added to the ModelHub database and the existing
-
Updated
Nov 16, 2019 - C++
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the distributed-computing topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the distributed-computing topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
There is no technical difficulty to support
includeValue
option, looks like we are just missing it on the API level.See SO question