bpo-44531: Add _PyType_AllocNoTrack() function #26947
Merged
+51
−28
Conversation
Add an internal _PyType_AllocNoTrack() function to allocate an object without tracking it in the GC. Modify dict_new() to use _PyType_AllocNoTrack(): dict subclasses are now only tracked once all PyDictObject members are initialized. Calling _PyObject_GC_UNTRACK() is no longer needed for the dict type. Similar change in tuple_subtype_new() for tuple subclasses. Replace tuple_gc_track() with _PyObject_GC_TRACK().
cc @methane @pablogsal: Would you mind to review this change? dict_new() and tuple_subtype_new() detect if a subclass overrides tp_alloc. IMO it's possible and so it's safer to detect it: check |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Add an internal _PyType_AllocNoTrack() function to allocate an object
without tracking it in the GC.
Modify dict_new() to use _PyType_AllocNoTrack(): dict subclasses are
now only tracked once all PyDictObject members are initialized.
Calling _PyObject_GC_UNTRACK() is no longer needed for the dict type.
Similar change in tuple_subtype_new() for tuple subclasses.
Replace tuple_gc_track() with _PyObject_GC_TRACK().
https://bugs.python.org/issue44531