Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.10] bpo-45123: PyAiter_Check and PyObject_GetAiter fix & rename. (GH-28194) #28199

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 7, 2021

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Sep 7, 2021

Fix PyAiter_Check to only check for the __anext__ presense (not for
__aiter__). Rename PyAiter_Check() to PyAIter_Check(),
PyObject_GetAiter() -> PyObject_GetAIter().

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo Salgado Pablogsal@gmail.com
(cherry picked from commit 2c3474a)

Co-authored-by: Yury Selivanov yury@edgedb.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue45123

@miss-islington miss-islington requested a review from a team as a code owner Sep 7, 2021
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

miss-islington commented Sep 7, 2021

@1st1 and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

miss-islington commented Sep 7, 2021

@1st1 and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success .

pablogsal
pablogsal previously approved these changes Sep 7, 2021
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

miss-islington commented Sep 7, 2021

@1st1 and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success .

…H-28194)

Fix PyAiter_Check to only check for the `__anext__` presense (not for
`__aiter__`). Rename `PyAiter_Check()` to `PyAIter_Check()`,
`PyObject_GetAiter()` -> `PyObject_GetAIter()`.

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo Salgado <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2c3474a)

Co-authored-by: Yury Selivanov <yury@edgedb.com>
@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit 53257cf into python:3.10 Sep 7, 2021
13 checks passed
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-2c3474a-3.10 branch Sep 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants