-
Updated
Nov 30, 2021 - Python
automated-machine-learning
Here are 103 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Jul 1, 2021 - Python
From issue #1302, it appears autosklearn is a bit unstable when run many times in the same script, i.e. in a for loop.
for i in range(400):
automodel = AutoSklearn(full_resources)
automodel.fit(x, y)
We currently have no test for this and it would be good to see if we can reproduce the same connection refused
error.
- With Featuretools 1.0.0 we add a dataframe to an EntitySet with the following:
es = ft.EntitySet('new_es')
es.add_dataframe(dataframe=orders_df,
dataframe_name='orders',
index='order_id',
time_index='order_date')
Improvement
- However, you could also change the EntitySet setter to add it with this approach:
es = ft.Ent
When running TabularPredictor.fit(), I encounter a BrokenPipeError for some reason.
What is causing this?
Could it be due to OOM error?
Fitting model: XGBoost ...
-34.1179 = Validation root_mean_squared_error score
10.58s = Training runtime
0.03s = Validation runtime
Fitting model: NeuralNetMXNet ...
-34.2849 = Validation root_mean_squared_error score
43.63s =
Problem
Some of our transformers & estimators are not thoroughly tested or not tested at all.
Solution
Use OpTransformerSpec
and OpEstimatorSpec
base test specs to provide tests for all existing transformers & estimators.
There are several evaluation metrics that would be particularly beneficial for (binary) imbalanced classification problems and would be greatly appreciated additions. In terms of prioritizing implementation (and likely ease of implementation I will rank-order these):
- AUCPR - helpful in the event that class labels are needed and the positive class is of greater importance.
- **F2 Scor
Support Python 3.10
Python 3.10 has been released. We should test it. If all the dependencies support it, we should add it to CI.
-
Updated
Feb 10, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 16, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 25, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 6, 2018 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 25, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Nov 29, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Nov 18, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Nov 19, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jan 31, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Oct 27, 2019 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Aug 29, 2016 - Python
-
Updated
Nov 29, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jul 25, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Oct 28, 2021 - Jupyter Notebook
The pipeline.fit/fit_from_scratch difference is quite confusing for new users.
So, common 'fit' should be preferred in all situations.
Cache-based fit should be moved to external function.
-
Updated
Nov 27, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Apr 7, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Nov 10, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Nov 30, 2021 - R
-
Updated
May 12, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Sep 4, 2021 - Python
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the automated-machine-learning topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the automated-machine-learning topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
Feature Description
We want to enable the users to specify the value ranges for any argument in the blocks.
The following code example shows a typical use case.
The users can specify the number of units in a DenseBlock to be either 10 or 20.
Code Example