Skip to content

[3.10] bpo-20369: concurrent.futures.wait() now deduplicates futures given a… (GH-30168) #30400

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jan 4, 2022

  • bpo-20369: concurrent.futures.wait() now deduplicates futures given as arg.

  • 📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.

Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7d7817c)

Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya 59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue20369

pythonGH-30168)

* bpo-20369: concurrent.futures.wait() now deduplicates futures given as arg.

* 📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.

Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7d7817c)

Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kumaraditya303 and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kumaraditya303 and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kumaraditya303 and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kumaraditya303 and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit ba12467 into python:3.10 Jan 4, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-7d7817c-3.10 branch January 4, 2022 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants