bpo-46504: faster code for trial quotient in x_divrem() #30856
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This brings x_divrem() back into synch with x_divrem1(), which was changed in bpo-46406 to generate faster code to find machine-word division quotients and remainders. Modern processors compute both with a single machine instructioh, but convincing C to exploit that requires writing _less_ "clever" C code.
gpshead
reviewed
Jan 24, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
This brings x_divrem() back into synch with x_divrem1(), which was changed
in bpo-46406 to generate faster code to find machine-word division
quotients and remainders. Modern processors compute both with a single
machine instruction, but convincing C to exploit that requires writing
less "clever" C code.
https://bugs.python.org/issue46504