Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1.0 csp #6995

Closed
wants to merge 905 commits into from
Closed

1.0 csp #6995

wants to merge 905 commits into from

Conversation

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

@gitWhatever
Copy link

@gitWhatever gitWhatever commented Nov 3, 2017

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Build-related changes
  • Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

Other information:

yyx990803 and others added 22 commits Mar 16, 2016
- No need to merge props into the data object. they should just be
  defined as reactive properties on the vm instance.

- They should not observe the value when set. They should already be reactive
  if needed.
update internal explain comments
Support the followings:
- Directive instance properties: `arg`, `modifiers`
- Priority for terminal directive

BREAKING CHANGES:
- API: Change internal `terminalDirectives` array to `terminal: true` directive options
yyx990803
Copy link
Member

yyx990803 commented on b80ae34 Mar 22, 2016

@hanai 是的,欢迎 PR

hanai
Copy link

hanai commented on b80ae34 Mar 22, 2016

这里是不是console个warning更好,因为这可能是个错误

yyx990803
Copy link
Member

yyx990803 commented on 163994c Aug 7, 2016

There will still be new releases for 1.x. And we will try to backport some useful features. It's just the current focus is getting 2.0 shipped first.

belisarh
Copy link

belisarh commented on 163994c Aug 7, 2016

Is it possible for this to be under a 1.0.x release or something similar? I see that further releases on the 1.x have been halted looking forward to v2 (yay!) but some backward compatible changes might be awesome to have.

broox
Copy link

broox commented on 3b49a63 Sep 27, 2016

my tests that were using nextTick started failing since updating to 1.0.27...

yyx990803
Copy link
Member

yyx990803 commented on 3b49a63 Sep 27, 2016

@broox a fix is already implemented, publishing soon.

Xelia
Copy link

Xelia commented on 3b49a63 Sep 25, 2016

I tried rc7, and i feel that old timerFunc was much more responsive then new.

@gitWhatever gitWhatever closed this Nov 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment