New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ProactorEventLoop doesn't support stdin/stdout nor files with connect_read_pipe/connect_write_pipe #71019
Comments
The documentation of asyncio specifies that the methods connect_read_pipe and connect_write_pipe are available on Windows with the ProactorEventLoop. The documentation then says that those methods accept file-like objects on the pipe parameter. However, the methods doesn't seem to work with stdio or any disk file under Windows. The following example catches this problem: import asyncio
import sys
class MyProtocol(asyncio.Protocol):
def connection_made(self, transport):
print('connection established')
def data_received(self, data):
print('received: {!r}'.format(data.decode()))
def connection_lost(self, exc):
print('lost connection')
if sys.platform.startswith('win32'):
loop = asyncio.ProactorEventLoop()
else:
loop = asyncio.SelectorEventLoop()
coro = loop.connect_read_pipe(MyProtocol, sys.stdin)
loop.run_until_complete(coro)
loop.run_forever()
loop.close() This code when executed on Ubuntu have the desired behavior, but under Windows 10 it gives OSError: [WinError 6] The handle is invalid. The complete output is this: c:\Users\Gabriel\Documents\Python Scripts>python async_pipe.py
connection established
Fatal read error on pipe transport
protocol: <__main__.MyProtocol object at 0x000001970EB2FAC8>
transport: <_ProactorReadPipeTransport fd=0>
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Program Files\Python35\lib\asyncio\proactor_events.py", line 195, in _loop_reading
self._read_fut = self._loop._proactor.recv(self._sock, 4096)
File "C:\Program Files\Python35\lib\asyncio\windows_events.py", line 425, in recv
self._register_with_iocp(conn)
File "C:\Program Files\Python35\lib\asyncio\windows_events.py", line 606, in _register_with_iocp
_overlapped.CreateIoCompletionPort(obj.fileno(), self._iocp, 0, 0)
OSError: [WinError 6] Identificador inválido
lost connection I think that the documentation should state that there is no support for disk files and stdio with the methods in question and also state what exactly they support (an example would be nice). And, of course, better support for watching file descriptors on Windows on future Python releases would be nice. Thank you, |
I don't think there's any case where this is going to work on an actual file - CreateIoCompletionPort needs a handle and not a file descriptor. Presumably this line of code normally gets used with something else that defines fileno()? |
The surprise to me, being on Windows, is that the pipe connection methods sometimes work with non-pipes. The limitations of Windows event loops are given in https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-eventloops.html#windows. The pipe connection functions are discussed in https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-eventloop.html#connect-pipes. Both say that the methods do not work with Windows' SelectorEventLoop. My understanding is that this is because Windows' select() call does not work with pipes -- meaning honest-to-goodness OS pipes. So I understood "*pipe* is file-like object." more as a un-surprising statement of fact than as a permissive "'pipe' can be any file-like object and not necessarily a pipe". If 'pipe' were intended to mean 'file-like', then why use 'pipe'? But I can see how a current unix user would understand that sentence the other way. Perhaps the sentence should read "For SelectorEventLoops (not on Windows), *pipe* can also be any file-like object with the appropriate methods." -- assuming that this is true on all non-Windows systems. Isn't there some other way to asynchronously read/file files, as opposed to sockets and pipes, on Windows? |
Pipes and file handles are equivalent in Windows, but socket handles are their own namespace and have their own functions. Some Python code will switch between them automatically to make socket functions work with file descriptors, but generally I'd expect stream pipes (as opposed to, IIRC, datagram pipes) to be compatible with files but not sockets. Not entirely sure how that plays into this issue, but it's a bit more background. |
Terry, About your question, "Isn't there some other way to asynchronously read/file files, as opposed to sockets and pipes, on Windows?", that is exactly the problem I was trying to overcome, specifically for reading the stdin. On my research I found both this stackoverflow questions with no valid answers: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31510190/aysncio-cannot-read-stdin-on-windows http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31511563/file-to-socket-adapter-in-python And I understood that 'pipe' wouldn't mean a 'file', but why can't I use 'sys.stdin' with 'ProactorEventLoop.connect_read_pipe()', can't 'sys.stdin' be a pipe on Windows like it can on Posix? |
I'm trying to figure out why Windows won't let us do this. I think the reason is that sys.std(in|out) filehandles are not opened as pipes, and do not have the required OVERLAPPED flag set (see the CreateIoCompletionPort documentation at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/fileio/createiocompletionport; it's that function that is used to handle pipes (via IocpProactor.recv -> IocpProactor._register_with_iocp -> overlapped.CreateIoCompletionPort). The solution then would be to create a pipe for a stdio filehandle with the flag set. And that's where my Windows-fu ends, and where I lack the VM and motivation to go try that out. |
It appears that connect_read_pipe also doesn't accept pipes returned by I think the error handling could be better (I only get logged errors, nothing I can catch/handle). It seems like Example that works on posix, but seems to fail with non-catchable errors with ProactorEventLoop:
|
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: