New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable JobTrackingWithFinalizers due to unresolved bug #109487
Disable JobTrackingWithFinalizers due to unresolved bug #109487
Conversation
@alculquicondor: This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The failure looks like #109473 |
8ccb9f2
to
8c3b44c
Compare
/sig apps |
/retest |
/priority critical-urgent |
Change-Id: Ieeeab689ae51dfe0dc06bdca88519d0ecf66d636
8c3b44c
to
3b18613
Compare
/lgtm This will be picked to release-1.23 to mitigate a regression in that release. If this isn't included in 1.24.0, we'd pick it to 1.24.1. I think it is clearer/cleaner to include in 1.24.0 (we're still in the window where regressions identified in release candidates would be fixed), but will defer to the release team. /hold for release team ack |
Does doc need to be updated as well: content/en/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/job.md ? |
I think so, I've opened a k/website issue here: kubernetes/website#32944 Thanks for the heads up @cici37! |
/lgtm
/approve
and
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, liggitt, soltysh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold cancel |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/kind regression
What this PR does / why we need it:
Disable JobTrackingWithFinalizers due to unresolved bug
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Mitigates #109485
Special notes for your reviewer:
There are no E2E changes required, because they are independent of the feature.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: